Article Transfer Vehicle Stop Indicator Validation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing article transport vehicle control systems face challenges in accurately detecting stop position indicators, leading to erroneous stops and difficulties in transferring articles when the detection unit incorrectly identifies the stop position, often due to malfunctions or environmental factors.

Innovation Solution

A control system for article transport vehicles that includes a stop position indicator and a stop notice indicator, where the control unit performs a travel stop process and transfers the article only if the distance between the detected stop notice and stop position indicators exceeds a predetermined notice distance, and initiates an anomaly notification if the distance is within a determination distance, thereby preventing incorrect transfers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the stop position indicator section is used alone for stopping the article transport vehicle, then the stopping control is simple, but erroneous detection occurs leading to incorrect stopping positions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidindicator structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stop position indicator is divided into two distinct sections: a stop notice indicator section that provides advance warning, and a stop position indicator section that marks the exact stopping point. This segmentation allows the system to distinguish between warning detection and actual stop triggering, preventing erroneous stops while maintaining structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The stop notice indicator section acts as an intermediary between the approach phase and the stopping phase. By detecting this intermediate marker first, the control unit can prepare for stopping and verify subsequent detection of the stop position indicator, creating a validation mechanism that prevents erroneous detection from causing incorrect stops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Speed

If the article transport vehicle stops immediately upon detecting the stop position indicator, then the response time is short, but articles cannot be transferred appropriately when detection is erroneous

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidtransfer accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit performs preliminary actions by detecting the stop notice indicator section before the stop position indicator section. This preliminary detection allows the system to prepare for stopping and establishes a sequence that must be followed, ensuring that immediate stopping only occurs after proper verification of the stop position, thus maintaining both speed and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback by requiring detection of the stop notice indicator section first, then verifying detection of the stop position indicator section before executing the stop command. This feedback mechanism ensures that stopping occurs only when both indicators are properly detected in sequence, preventing erroneous stops while maintaining rapid response when detection is correct.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If marks are provided at positions corresponding to the stop site, then the stopping control is straightforward, but erroneous detection causes the vehicle to stop at wrong positions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidposition accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The indicator system is segmented into two functional parts: the stop notice indicator section for advance warning and the stop position indicator section for precise location marking. This segmentation maintains operational simplicity while improving position accuracy by requiring detection of both sections in sequence before stopping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The stop notice indicator section serves as an intermediary marker that provides advance warning before the actual stop position. This intermediary element allows the control unit to verify the detection sequence and ensure accurate positioning, preventing wrong-stop errors while keeping the control system straightforward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20220380183A1Control System
Publication Date: 2022.12.01 DAIFUKU CO LTD
  • US20220380183A1 patent drawing
  • US20220380183A1 patent drawing
  • US20220380183A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A control unit performs a travel stop process for stopping travel of a travel unit in response to an indicator detection unit detecting a stop notice indicator section and then detecting a stop position indicator section. After the travel of the travel unit is stopped as a result of the travel stop process, the control unit performs a transfer process for causing a transfer unit to transfer an article. The control unit performs, instead of the transfer process, anomaly notification processing for providing a notification of an occurrence of an anomaly to a superordinate control unit, after the travel of the travel unit is stopped by the travel stop process, in response to: (i) a travel distance, from a position at which the indicator detection unit has detected the stop notice indicator section, being smaller than a determination distance smaller than a notice distance, and (ii) the indicator detection unit detecting the stop position indicator section.