Transfer Zone Entry Control for Mixed Container Vehicle Traffic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing handling plants for container transport vehicles face challenges in preventing collisions between manually guided and automated guided vehicles in transfer zones, requiring physical access restrictions like fences and barriers, which are costly and limit the scalability of transfer zones.

Innovation Solution

A method and control system that grants or denies authorization for vehicles to enter transfer zones based on predefined criteria, using a safety controller and vehicle controller to intervene in the vehicle's control system if unauthorized, thereby preventing entry without physical barriers, and includes a position detection system to recognize critical movement profiles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If physical access restrictions like fences and barriers are used to prevent collisions between manually guided and automated guided vehicles in transfer zones, then safety is improved, but device complexity and infrastructure costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical physical barriers (fences and barriers) with an electronic control system that uses sensors, processors, and actuators to detect vehicle positions and automatically intervene in vehicle control. This substitution eliminates the need for complex physical infrastructure while maintaining safety through automated electronic monitoring and control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a control system as an intermediary between manually guided and automated guided vehicles. This intermediary system receives data from both vehicle types, processes their positions and trajectories, and coordinates their movements to prevent collisions. The control system acts as a mediator that manages interactions without requiring physical separation barriers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If physical barriers are installed to separate manual and automated areas, then collision prevention is improved, but the area of transfer zones is reduced and scalability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision preventionVSAvoidarea of transfer zones
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By replacing physical barriers with an electronic control system, the patent removes the spatial constraints imposed by fences and barriers. This allows transfer zones to expand into areas that would previously have been blocked by physical infrastructure, increasing the available area for vehicle operations and improving zone scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If physical barriers are used to separate vehicle types, then safety is improved, but infrastructure costs and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidinfrastructure costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes expensive physical infrastructure (fences, barriers, gates) with a software-based control system that runs on existing vehicle controllers and infrastructure computers. This electronic solution significantly reduces manufacturing and installation costs while providing equivalent or superior safety through automated real-time monitoring and intervention capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Adaptability or versatility

If manual intervention is required for vehicle control in transfer zones, then flexibility is improved, but productivity decreases due to slower response times

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a system where the control system automatically monitors vehicle positions, detects potential collisions, and intervenes without requiring human drivers to constantly monitor surroundings or make manual adjustments. The system serves itself by autonomously managing safety protocols, which maintains operational flexibility while dramatically improving productivity through faster response times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control system continuously receives feedback from sensors monitoring vehicle positions and trajectories, processes this information in real-time, and automatically adjusts control signals to prevent collisions. This closed-loop feedback mechanism provides both the flexibility of adaptive response and the speed of automated action, eliminating the trade-off between manual flexibility and automated productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11518627B2Method for controlling travel within a transfer zone for containers of transport vehicles in a terminal for containers, control system for same, and terminal comprising a control system of this kind
Publication Date: 2022.12.06 KONECRANES GLOBAL OY
  • US11518627B2 patent drawing
  • US11518627B2 patent drawing
  • US11518627B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, system, and terminal are provided for controlling travel of transport vehicles within a transfer zone. The transfer zone connects an automatic region for automatically guided transport vehicles to a manual region for manually guided transport vehicles. The transport vehicles travelling through the transfer zone in order to deliver or pick up containers in the transfer zone are granted or refused authorization to enter the transfer zone in order to travel through the transfer zone. In the absence of granted authorization for entry of a manually guided transport vehicle into a transfer region of the transfer zone, an intervention is automatically implemented in a controller of the transport vehicle in such a way that at least full entry, but optionally even partial entry, to the transfer zone is prevented.