Transformable Obstacle Assembly for Skateboard Training

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Skateboarders and other extreme sport athletes face limited options for performing tricks due to the lack of versatile and transformable obstacles, leading to boredom and stagnation in their training.

Innovation Solution

A transformable obstacle assembly featuring a dual rail structure with adjustable support structures, panels, and ribs made from materials like steel and polyvinyl chloride, allowing for various configurations, heights, and orientations to mimic different obstacles, providing a range of challenges and trick options.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple separate obstacles are provided to give riders variety, then trick options and challenges increase, but the device complexity and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrick optionsVSAvoidobstacle configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The obstacle is divided into multiple independent components including rails of different lengths, panels, and support structures that can be individually selected and combined. This segmentation allows riders to create various trick configurations using different combinations of components without needing multiple complete obstacle sets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The obstacle components are designed with universal connection features and standardized interfaces that allow the same rail or panel to serve multiple functions in different configurations. A single rail can be used for grinds, slides, or as a support element depending on how it is assembled with other components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If fixed obstacles are used to provide consistent training surfaces, then training reliability is maintained, but rider boredom and skill stagnation occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining consistencyVSAvoidobstacle variety
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The obstacle system transitions from a fixed configuration to a dynamic, reconfigurable structure. Rails and panels can be easily assembled, disassembled, and rearranged to create different challenge levels and trick variations, allowing the training environment to adapt as rider skills progress while maintaining consistent quality surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Area of stationary object

If location-specific obstacles are installed to accommodate limited space, then space utilization is optimized, but the range of available tricks is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace utilizationVSAvoidtrick range
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Smaller obstacle components such as short rails and compact panels are designed to nest within or alongside larger structures. This nesting allows multiple obstacle types to be combined in a compact footprint, enabling a wide range of tricks to be performed in limited spaces without requiring excessive area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS9302174B2Transformable obstacle assembly
Publication Date: 2016.04.05 FUHRMEISTER CORY
  • US9302174B2 patent drawing
  • US9302174B2 patent drawing
  • US9302174B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A transformable obstacle assembly is described. Embodiments of the transformable obstacle assembly include a dual rail structure and a pair of support structures. Typically, the dual rail structure can include a first rail, a second rail, a plurality of ribs, and a pair of panels. The plurality of ribs can be implemented to couple the first rail to the second rail. To elevate the dual rail structure of the ground, the pair of support structures can be coupled to opposite ends of the dual rail structure. In one embodiment, a height of the support structures can be altered to raise and lower the dual rail structure. Typically, the dual rail structure can be implemented in either a horizontal orientation or a vertical orientation.