Transformation Node Cluster for Scalable Content Format Conversion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current content transformation systems lack efficient scalability and specificity in converting content items from a source format to a target format, often relying on generic processing nodes that are not preconfigured for specific transformations, leading to inefficiencies in handling diverse content formats and high loads.

Innovation Solution

A transformation node cluster with a router node that identifies the current and target content formats and routes the content item to pre-configured transformation nodes capable of executing specific transformation types, allowing for a chain of transformations and dynamic reconfiguration based on load balancing and transformation types, enabling efficient and scalable content transformations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If generic processing nodes are used for content transformation, then device complexity is reduced, but transformation specificity and processing efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoidtransformation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments transformation functionality into specialized nodes, where each node is dedicated to specific transformation types (e.g., PDF to Word, Image to PDF). This segmentation allows each node to be optimized for its specific task, improving transformation efficiency while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different nodes within the cluster have specialized capabilities tailored to specific transformation requirements. Each node possesses local expertise in particular format conversions, enabling optimized processing for specific content types while the overall system maintains versatility through the collective capabilities of specialized nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If pre-configured specialized transformation nodes are used, then transformation specificity and processing efficiency are improved, but device complexity and system configuration requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransformation efficiencyVSAvoidnode configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Transformation nodes are pre-configured with specific transformation capabilities during system deployment. This preliminary configuration allows nodes to be ready for immediate use without requiring complex runtime configuration, improving transformation efficiency while simplifying operational complexity through advance preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts transformation parameters and routing decisions based on content type, target format, and node availability. This parameter flexibility allows the system to optimize performance for different transformation scenarios without requiring complex manual configuration, balancing efficiency gains with operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a single transformation node handles all content types, then device complexity is reduced, but processing time and scalability worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenode structureVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The transformation system is segmented into multiple specialized nodes, each handling specific content types or transformation formats. This segmentation enables parallel processing of different content types simultaneously, reducing overall processing time and improving scalability while maintaining reasonable system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a dimensional separation between content type handling and transformation processing. By organizing nodes according to both source format and target format dimensions, the system achieves efficient routing and processing without requiring a single monolithic node, reducing processing time through specialized handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If dynamic routing based on load balancing is implemented, then system scalability and efficiency are improved, but routing complexity and control mechanisms worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem scalabilityVSAvoidrouting control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The routing mechanism operates autonomously by automatically selecting appropriate transformation nodes based on predefined criteria such as content type, target format, and node availability. This self-service routing eliminates the need for complex manual control mechanisms while maintaining scalability through automated load balancing and dynamic node selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor node performance and availability in real-time, dynamically adjusting routing decisions based on current system state. This feedback-driven routing optimizes scalability and efficiency while managing complexity through automated adaptation rather than manual control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11082517B2Content transformations using a transformation node cluster
Publication Date: 2021.08.03 HYLAND UK OPERATIONS LTD
  • US11082517B2 patent drawing
  • US11082517B2 patent drawing
  • US11082517B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for content transformation using a transformation node cluster. The transformation node cluster may comprise a plurality of nodes including a plurality of transformation nodes configured to execute one or more content transformation types. A request may be received from a client machine for a content item stored in a repository associated with a server machine that is associated with the transformation node cluster. A current content format of the content item and a target content format of the content item may be identified. The target content format may differ from the current content format. A chain of transformations may be determined as including a first transformation type for transforming the content item from the current content format to an intermediate content format.