Transformative Processing Engine for Predictive Data Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing volume of data generated daily poses inefficiencies in sorting and decision-making processes, as much data is either ignored or abandoned, leading to undesirable outcomes in operational environments.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a transformative processing engine that manages and processes data from various sources, including sensors and user devices, to aggregate, transform, and store data in a unified format, enabling efficient data sharing and decision-making across different formats and protocols.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If data is stored and sorted through in operational flows, then decision-making accuracy improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and categorizing data during ingestion, creating indexed structures and metadata profiles before queries are executed. This allows the system to quickly retrieve and analyze only relevant data subsets when making operational decisions, rather than sorting through all stored data each time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts only the necessary subset of data required for specific decision-making contexts, rather than retrieving and processing all available data. Query optimization mechanisms identify and extract only relevant records based on query parameters, data relationships, and pre-computed indexes, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Loss of information

If all generated data is retained and processed, then valuable information is preserved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata value retentionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different retention and processing strategies to different types of data based on their characteristics and value. Hot data that is frequently accessed and high-value data are retained in optimized formats with full detail, while cold or low-value data are archived or summarized. This local differentiation maintains information value while reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The data system is segmented into multiple storage tiers and processing layers, with different retention policies and access mechanisms for each segment. This includes hot storage for frequently accessed data, cold storage for archival data, and intermediate layers for less frequently accessed information. Each segment is managed independently with appropriate complexity levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If data is abandoned or ignored to reduce processing overhead, then processing efficiency improves, but decision quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoiddecision quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor decision outcomes and data utilization patterns. When data elements are identified as contributing to improved decision quality, the system adjusts retention and processing priorities accordingly. This feedback loop ensures that data abandonment decisions are based on actual impact rather than arbitrary thresholds, maintaining decision quality while preserving processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts data processing parameters such as retrieval depth, analysis granularity, and retention thresholds based on contextual factors including query importance, available resources, and historical performance. This allows the system to optimize the balance between processing efficiency and decision quality for each specific operational context rather than using fixed rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10970635B1Data processing for making predictive determinations
Publication Date: 2021.04.06 CHCA
  • US10970635B1 patent drawing
  • US10970635B1 patent drawing
  • US10970635B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some examples, structured and unstructured data is evaluated using one or more predictive models to determine whether a dependent user is at risk for a certain condition. In other examples, structured and unstructured data is evaluated using one or more predictive models to determine a contact plan for contacting dependent users regarding follow-up appointments related to release of the dependent user.