Disassembled Transformer Core Erection Using Portal Lifter

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing transformer transportation and assembly methods require significant time, space, and cost due to the need for multiple heavy machines and large installation spaces, and are weather-dependent, making them inefficient and costly for installing large capacity transformers in challenging locations.

Innovation Solution

A disassembled transportation method where a U-shaped iron core is transported in a sideways attitude and reassembled using a portal lifter with extensible booms and a beam to erect the core, reducing the need for large heavy devices and allowing assembly in a smaller space without a dedicated clean house, enabling faster and more cost-effective installation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple heavy machines are used to hoist and erect the U-shaped iron core tank, then the iron core can be assembled and erected, but the installation space required increases and the rental cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveiron core assembly capabilityVSAvoidinstallation space
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The iron core is divided into multiple U-shaped iron cores, each housed in a separate tank. These smaller tanks can be transported and assembled individually in limited space, then connected to form the complete transformer core structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The U-shaped iron core is nested within the erection tank during transport. The tank serves as a protective container that also defines the assembly space, eliminating the need for separate clean rooms or large assembly halls

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If multiple heavy machines are used to hoist and erect the U-shaped iron core tank, then the iron core can be assembled and erected, but the rental cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveiron core assembly capabilityVSAvoidheavy equipment rental cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The erection tank serves multiple functions: it protects the iron core during transport, provides a controlled assembly environment, and acts as the final housing structure. This eliminates the need for separate clean rooms, assembly halls, and multiple heavy lifting devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The erection tank is designed to be self-contained, providing its own protective environment and assembly space. The tank structure itself becomes the workspace, eliminating the need for external heavy machinery and dedicated assembly facilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If the U-shaped iron core is assembled in a conventional assembling room with dehumidification and dust removal, then the assembly quality is maintained, but the installation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly qualityVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The erection tank is prepared in advance with the necessary assembly environment. The tank can be pre-positioned and pre-prepared for assembly, eliminating the time required to build and prepare separate clean rooms or assembly halls on-site

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The assembly environment parameters (temperature, humidity, cleanliness) are controlled within the erection tank rather than requiring a separate controlled environment facility. This allows assembly to proceed in the tank itself without additional preparation time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Length of moving object

If the U-shaped iron core is disassembled into smaller parts (leg iron core and lower-yoke iron core), then the transportation size is reduced, but the assembly complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransportation dimensionVSAvoidassembly process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The iron core is segmented into transportable components (leg iron cores and lower-yoke iron cores) that fit within the erection tank. These segments are designed to be assembled in a predetermined sequence using simple connection operations, maintaining simplicity despite the divided structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8225490B2Disassembled transportation transformer transporting/assembling method
Publication Date: 2012.07.24 KK TOSHIBA
  • US8225490B2 patent drawing
  • US8225490B2 patent drawing
  • US8225490B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A transformer transporting/assembling method comprises a transportation step of transporting a U-shaped iron core with an iron plate horizontally extending to a place near an installation site and an erection step of erecting the U-shaped iron core together with an erection tank from a state that the iron plate extends horizontally to a state that the iron plate extend vertically, with the U-shaped iron core contained in the erection tank. The erection step includes a sub-step in which a portal lifter composed of two booms which are vertically expandable and parallel movable with a predetermined distance therebetween and between which the erection tank is disposed and a beam horizontally connecting the two booms and vertically moved as the booms expands or contracts is used, the beam supports the erection tank through a flexible member at predetermined support portions, and the beam is vertically moved by expanding/contracting the booms.