Transformer-Coupled VCO Tuning Without Variable Capacitors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional voltage controlled oscillators (VCOs) face limitations in tuning range and oscillation frequency due to the reliance on variable capacitors, which trade off between high frequency operation and wide tuning range, especially at high frequencies where parasitic capacitors reduce the effectiveness of variable capacitors.

Innovation Solution

The VCO design eliminates the need for variable capacitors by adjusting the current of resonance transistors to change the oscillation frequency, using voltage controlled current sources, negative resistance circuits, and transformers to alter the mutual inductance and transconductance, thereby increasing oscillation frequency without limiting tuning range.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If variable capacitor is used to tune oscillation frequency, then tuning range is improved, but oscillation frequency is reduced due to increased total equivalent capacitance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetuning rangeVSAvoidoscillation frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the control parameter from capacitance (variable capacitor) to inductance (variable inductor). By making the inductor variable instead of the capacitor, the oscillation frequency can be tuned without increasing total capacitance, thus resolving the trade-off between tuning range and oscillation frequency. The variable inductor allows frequency adjustment while maintaining low total capacitance for high-frequency operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If variable capacitor capacitance is increased to maximize tuning range, then tuning range is improved, but oscillation frequency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetuning rangeVSAvoidhigh frequency operation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the controlled parameter from capacitance to inductance. By using a variable inductor with controlled current, the tuning range is achieved through inductance variation rather than capacitance variation. This allows the total capacitance to remain low (only parasitic capacitor CP), enabling high-frequency operation while maintaining wide tuning range through inductance adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If conventional LC-VCO configuration with variable capacitor is used, then frequency synthesis is achieved, but the proportion of variable capacitor capacitance relative to total equivalent capacitance is reduced due to parasitic capacitor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency synthesis capabilityVSAvoidtuning range
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the control mechanism from variable capacitance to variable inductance. The variable inductor is controlled by current to adjust its inductance value, which directly affects the oscillation frequency. This approach eliminates the limitation imposed by parasitic capacitance on the variable capacitor's effectiveness, allowing full utilization of the tuning element for frequency synthesis while maintaining wide tuning range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for higher oscillation frequencies and expanded tuning ranges without the constraints of variable capacitors, enabling more flexible and efficient high-frequency operation in RF circuits.

Implementation Method 1

adjusting the current of resonance transistors to change the oscillation frequency, using voltage controlled current sources, negative resistance circuits, and transformers to alter the mutual inductance and transconductance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTransconductance:

Implementation Method 2

using voltage controlled current sources, negative resistance circuits, and transformers to alter the mutual inductance and transconductance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMutual inductance: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

Transistors Mn1 and Mn2 form the NRC

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNegative resistance:

Data Source

PatentUS8035457B2Voltage controlled oscillator
Publication Date: 2011.10.11 IND TECH RES INST
  • US8035457B2 patent drawing
  • US8035457B2 patent drawing
  • US8035457B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A voltage controlled oscillator (VCO) includes a voltage controlled current source (VCCS), a negative resistance circuit (NRC), a first transformer, a second transformer, a first transistor and a second transistor. A current terminal of the VCCS receives a control voltage. First terminals of first and second current paths in the NRC are coupled to a current terminal of the VCCS. Primary sides of the first and the second transformers are respectively coupled to second terminals of the first and the second current paths. Secondary sides of the first and the second transformers are first and second output terminals of the VCO, respectively. First terminals of the first and the second transistor are respectively coupled to the secondary sides of the first and the second transformers. Control terminals of the first and the second transformers are respectively coupled to the primary sides of the first and the second transformers.