Transformer Tank Mounting Seat for Support Fitting Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing transformer designs face challenges in efficiently attaching large support brackets to the sidewall of the tank, leading to increased assembly time due to the need for multiple beam connections, which prolongs the installation process of large transformers.

Innovation Solution

The design enhances the strength of the support fitting by enlarging its sectional area, allowing for the attachment of a larger support fitting in the height or width direction directly to the tank's peripheral wall, reducing the number of beams required and simplifying the assembly process through the use of mounting seats bonded to both the upper and middle tank peripheral walls.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a large support fitting is attached to the sidewall of the tank, then the strength of the support fitting is enhanced, but it becomes difficult to attach due to the presence of instruments and seams on the tank sidewall

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrength of support fittingVSAvoidease of attachment to tank sidewall
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure is divided into two parts: a mounting seat that is bonded to the tank sidewall (avoiding instruments and seams) and a support fitting that is attached to the mounting seat. This segmentation allows the support fitting to be larger and stronger while the mounting seat handles the attachment complexity to the tank.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A mounting seat is introduced as an intermediary component between the tank sidewall and the support fitting. The mounting seat serves as a mediator that facilitates the attachment of the large support fitting to the tank without being constrained by the presence of instruments and seams on the tank sidewall.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Strength

If many beam members are connected to the support fitting to secure necessary strength, then the strength requirement is met, but the assembling time of the transformer is lengthened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrength of support fittingVSAvoidassembling time at installation location
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure is segmented into a mounting seat and support fitting, where the mounting seat is pre-bonded to the tank during manufacturing. This allows the support fitting to be a single large component rather than multiple beam members, reducing assembly time at the installation location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design changes the structural parameters of the support fitting by using a single large-section component instead of multiple smaller beam members. This parameter change maintains the required strength while significantly reducing the number of connections and assembly time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11404194B2Transformer
Publication Date: 2022.08.02 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • US11404194B2 patent drawing
  • US11404194B2 patent drawing
  • US11404194B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A transformer includes a transformer body, a tank, a conservator, a plurality of support fittings, and at least one mounting seat. Transformer body includes an iron core and a winding. Tank includes an upper tank, a middle tank, and a lower tank that are bonded together to form an internal space accommodating transformer body. Conservator is arranged at a position above tank. The plurality of support fittings are arranged side by side at intervals to support conservator. At least one mounting seat is bonded to both a peripheral wall of upper tank and a peripheral wall of middle tank, and fixed to tank, and the plurality of support fittings are attached.