Transformer Parallel Execution Planning for Dynamic AI Workloads

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The escalating size and complexity of generative AI models necessitate effective parallelism for distributed execution, but existing methods face challenges such as scalability issues, suboptimal performance, and the dynamic nature of input/output shapes, which complicates the distribution of computational workloads across devices.

Innovation Solution

An automatic partition framework that leverages the repeated layer structure of transformer models, generating candidate execution plans using various parallelisms and collective communications, and simulating resource usage to determine an optimal execution plan that accommodates dynamic input/output shapes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If distributed execution is used to manage computational power requirements, then the model can be executed on available devices, but developing effective parallelism for partitioning devices becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to dynamic computational resourcesVSAvoidcomplexity of parallelism development
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically generating candidate execution plans and selecting optimal parallelism strategies without requiring manual intervention. The framework autonomously analyzes the computational graph, identifies partitioning opportunities, and determines the best distribution of operations across devices, thereby resolving the complexity of developing effective parallelism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The framework dynamically changes execution parameters by generating multiple candidate execution plans with different parallelism strategies. It evaluates these plans based on various parameters such as device availability, computational load, and data dependencies, then selects the optimal plan that adapts to the current computational resource state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If manual parallelism development is used, then execution plans can be created, but the process requires significant effort and does not scale well

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution efficiencyVSAvoidtime for developing parallelism
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The framework performs preliminary action by pre-generating multiple candidate execution plans with different parallelism strategies before actual model execution. It analyzes the computational graph structure, identifies potential partitioning points, and prepares optimized execution plans in advance, thereby eliminating the need for time-consuming manual parallelism development during runtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates multiple copies of candidate execution plans with different parallelism configurations. By generating and evaluating multiple replicated plans with varying device partitions and operation distributions, it efficiently identifies the optimal execution strategy without requiring manual intervention for each configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of manufacture

If fixed parallelism strategies are used, then implementation is simpler, but the system cannot adapt to dynamic computational resources and varying workload characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidadaptability to dynamic conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The framework implements dynamic adaptability by generating multiple candidate execution plans with different parallelism strategies and selecting the optimal one based on current computational resource availability and workload characteristics. It dynamically adjusts device partitioning, operation distribution, and data flow configurations to match the prevailing system state, thereby achieving both ease of implementation through automation and adaptability to dynamic conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260044427A1Automatic parallel execution of artificial intelligence workloads
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US20260044427A1 patent drawing
  • US20260044427A1 patent drawing
  • US20260044427A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method can receive an internal representation of a transformer model, an internal representation of a device cluster, and an internal representation of a workload for execution of the transformer model on the device cluster. The method can generate a plurality of candidate execution plans based on the internal representation of the transformer model and the internal representation of the device cluster. Each candidate execution plan represents a unique parallel schedule for partitioning devices in the device cluster for parallel execution of the transformer model. The method can determine an optimal execution plan, including evaluating resource usage of the plurality of candidate execution plans based on the internal representation of the workload, and selecting, among the plurality of candidate execution plans, the optimal execution plan which yields the lowest resource usage. The evaluating includes simulating execution of the transformer model on the device cluster to process the workload.