Transient Immune Modulation for Enzyme Replacement Therapy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for Pompe disease is often hindered by immune responses, particularly in CRIM-negative patients, leading to high and sustained antibody titers that reduce treatment efficacy and clinical outcomes.

Innovation Solution

A transient low-dose immune modulation regimen using methotrexate, administered concurrently with ERT, to induce immune tolerance and prevent the formation of high and sustained anti-rhGAA immunoglobulin G antibody titers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is administered to CRIM-negative patients, then the therapeutic enzyme is delivered to target cells, but the patient's immune system recognizes the enzyme as foreign and forms high and sustained anti-rhGAA IgG antibodies that reduce treatment efficacy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficacyVSAvoidanti-rhGAA antibody formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by administering immune modulators (such as rituximab, methotrexate, or IVIG) before initiating enzyme replacement therapy to CRIM-negative patients. This preemptive immunomodulation conditions the immune system in advance to tolerate the therapeutic enzyme, preventing the formation of high and sustained anti-rhGAA antibodies that would otherwise reduce treatment efficacy. The immune modulators are given for a limited period (e.g., 3-6 months) before ERT begins, creating an immunologically favorable environment for subsequent enzyme administration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-generated harmful factors

If prolonged immunosuppression is used to minimize antibody titers in patients with established HSAT, then antibody levels are reduced, but the treatment requires prolonged immunosuppression with maintenance doses of rituximab and methotrexate along with bortezomib

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantibody titersVSAvoidduration of immunosuppression
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by administering immune modulators (such as rituximab, methotrexate, or IVIG) before initiating enzyme replacement therapy to CRIM-negative patients. This preemptive immunomodulation conditions the immune system in advance to tolerate the therapeutic enzyme, preventing the formation of high and sustained anti-rhGAA antibodies that would otherwise reduce treatment efficacy. The immune modulators are given for a limited period (e.g., 3-6 months) before ERT begins, creating an immunologically favorable environment for subsequent enzyme administration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies periodic action by using transient, time-limited courses of immune modulators rather than continuous prolonged immunosuppression. The immune modulating agents are administered for specific predetermined periods (e.g., rituximab for 4 weeks, methotrexate for 3-6 months, or IVIG for 5-10 days) and then discontinued. This periodic administration achieves the goal of minimizing antibody titers while avoiding the need for indefinite maintenance dosing, thereby reducing the overall duration and burden of immunosuppressive therapy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Object-generated harmful factors

If multiple immune modulating treatment regimens are administered to patients with entrenched immune response, then therapy attempts to decrease existing anti-rhGAA antibodies, but antibody titers persist after multiple treatment regimens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexisting anti-rhGAA antibodiesVSAvoidresponse to immune modulating therapy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by administering immune modulators (such as rituximab, methotrexate, or IVIG) before initiating enzyme replacement therapy to CRIM-negative patients. This preemptive immunomodulation conditions the immune system in advance to tolerate the therapeutic enzyme, preventing the formation of high and sustained anti-rhGAA antibodies that would otherwise reduce treatment efficacy. The immune modulators are given for a limited period (e.g., 3-6 months) before ERT begins, creating an immunologically favorable environment for subsequent enzyme administration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by selecting and combining different immune modulating agents with distinct mechanisms of action (rituximab targeting B-cells, methotrexate affecting T-cell and B-cell function, IVIG providing immunomodulatory antibodies) and adjusting their dosing parameters (duration, timing relative to ERT initiation). This multi-parameter approach addresses entrenched immune responses by changing the immunological parameters before ERT begins, rather than attempting to modify established high-titer antibody responses with single-agent therapies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11944628B2Methods for the use of low-dose immune modulators transiently for treating patients undergoing protein replacement therapy
Publication Date: 2024.04.02 DUKE UNIV
  • US11944628B2 patent drawing
  • US11944628B2 patent drawing
  • US11944628B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides compositions and methods for inducing immune tolerance in subjects suffering from metabolic diseases.