Transit Link Coordination for Wireless Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing distributed wireless communication networks face challenges in coordinating transit links between network nodes, particularly in managing beam alignment, frequency channels, and polarization, especially in asynchronous systems where synchronization is difficult to maintain, leading to inefficiencies and potential loss of network nodes due to interference or physical blockage.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced where network nodes monitor for communications control signals to select and coordinate transit links, using a neighborhood mode to listen for signals and a traffic mode to exchange data, with the option to designate master and slave nodes for scheduled rendezvous times, allowing for dynamic adaptation of link capacity and reducing the likelihood of node loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If synchronized coordination technique is used to manage transit links, then beam alignment and frequency coordination are improved, but system complexity increases due to clock distribution and synchronization maintenance requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam alignment coordinationVSAvoidsynchronization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the synchronization function from the transit link coordination system, allowing nodes to operate independently without centralized clock distribution. Each node maintains its own timing, eliminating the need for complex synchronization infrastructure while still achieving coordinated beam alignment through distributed control signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Nodes perform self-coordination by autonomously managing their own beam alignment and timing without relying on external synchronization sources. The system uses distributed intelligence where each node independently makes coordination decisions based on local conditions and exchanged control messages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If fixed length time slots are allocated to each transit link, then timing coordination is simplified, but link capacity is wasted when there is no traffic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime slot managementVSAvoidlink capacity utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic time slot allocation where slot lengths and frequencies are adjusted based on actual traffic conditions. Instead of fixed assignments, nodes negotiate and adapt their transmission parameters in real-time, allowing the system to optimize capacity utilization while maintaining operational simplicity through automated resource management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If smaller time slots are used to reduce waste, then capacity efficiency is improved, but timing accuracy and resolution requirements become more difficult to achieve

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapacity efficiencyVSAvoidtiming accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces precise mechanical timing synchronization with message-based coordination. Instead of relying on tightly synchronized clocks and precise time slot boundaries, nodes use exchanged control messages to negotiate and coordinate their transmissions, significantly reducing timing accuracy requirements while maintaining high capacity efficiency through flexible resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If synchronized clocks are distributed to all nodes, then coordination between nodes is improved, but the system becomes vulnerable to interference and physical blockage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenode coordinationVSAvoidinterference and blockage vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the coordination function into independent node-level operations rather than a centralized synchronized system. Each node maintains independent timing and makes local coordination decisions, preventing single-point failures from interference or blockage. The distributed architecture ensures that problems at one node do not propagate to others.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS7453832B2Transit link coordination systems and methods for a distributed wireless communication network
Publication Date: 2008.11.18 APPLE INC
  • US7453832B2 patent drawing
  • US7453832B2 patent drawing
  • US7453832B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods of coordinating transit links between network nodes in a wireless communication network are disclosed. Transit links between a network node and respective neighbouring network nodes are monitored for communications control signals from any of the neighbouring network nodes, and a particular transit link is selected for data exchange upon receipt of a communications control signal. Each transit radio link antenna beam at a network node is thereby aligned with a respective neighbouring network node when the neighbouring node sends a communications control signal.