Transit Vehicle Trip Determination for Schedule Adherence

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Transit vehicles often fail to adhere to published schedules, leading to rider inconvenience and potential decline in ridership due to late arrivals or early departures, which existing traffic control systems do not effectively address.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing a GPS module on transit vehicles to determine their current location and heading, communicating this data to a computer processor to select the appropriate trip schedule from a database, and outputting signals to indicate if the vehicle is ahead of or behind schedule, triggering actions such as enabling or disabling traffic signal priority requests, displaying scheduling information, or communicating with dispatchers or other vehicles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traffic control preemption systems are used to assist transit vehicles through signalized intersections, then speed and schedule efficiency are improved, but transit vehicles still fail to adhere to published schedules due to lack of real-time schedule adherence monitoring

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveschedule efficiencyVSAvoidschedule adherence
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the transit vehicle's current location via GPS, compares it against the scheduled location at the current time, and provides real-time feedback on schedule adherence. This feedback loop enables the system to detect when the vehicle is ahead or behind schedule and trigger appropriate actions, such as enabling or disabling preemption requests, to maintain schedule compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The transit vehicle system automatically determines its own schedule adherence status by comparing GPS-derived location and time data against the published schedule. The system self-regulates by automatically enabling or disabling preemption requests based on its own performance, without requiring external manual intervention or monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of time

If preemption requests are continuously enabled to maintain schedule adherence, then punctuality improves, but unnecessary preemption requests may be generated when the vehicle is already ahead of schedule

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime loss due to schedule delaysVSAvoidunnecessary preemption requests
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The preemption request status is dynamically adjusted based on real-time schedule adherence conditions. The system transitions the preemption enablement state according to whether the vehicle is ahead of, on, or behind schedule, optimizing the use of preemption requests to only when necessary for maintaining punctuality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameter of preemption request enablement based on the schedule adherence parameter. When the vehicle is ahead of schedule, the preemption parameter is set to disabled; when behind schedule, it is enabled. This parameter adjustment ensures preemption requests are generated only when needed to correct schedule deviations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If manual monitoring and adjustment of trip schedules is performed, then schedule adherence can be maintained, but labor costs increase and human error may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveschedule adherenceVSAvoidmanual monitoring system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically monitors its own schedule adherence by comparing GPS-derived location and time data against the published schedule without requiring external manual monitoring. The system self-regulates by automatically enabling or disabling preemption requests based on its own performance, eliminating the need for manual intervention and reducing human error while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical monitoring and adjustment process is replaced with an automated electronic system that uses GPS receivers, computer processors, and communication networks to continuously track vehicle location, calculate schedule adherence, and adjust preemption requests automatically, eliminating the need for human operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Automatically determines and configures trip information, reducing errors and ensuring transit vehicles operate according to schedules, thereby improving punctuality and maintaining ridership by enabling or disabling traffic signal priority requests based on real-time schedule adherence.

Implementation Method 1

determining a current location and current heading of a transit vehicle by a global positioning system (GPS) module aboard the transit vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGPS satellite signal reception:

Data Source

PatentEP3292548B1Trip determination for managing transit vehicle schedules
Publication Date: 2019.07.03 GLOBAL TRAFFIC TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • EP3292548B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3292548B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3292548B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Approaches for managing transit vehicle schedules. The method includes determining a current location and current heading of a transit vehicle by a global positioning system (GPS) module aboard the transit vehicle and communicating the current location and current heading to a computer processor. The computer processor determines a current time and current day, and a trip schedule is selected from a plurality of trip schedules in a database. The selected trip schedule has attributes consistent with the current location, current heading, current time, and current day. The method determines whether the transit vehicle is ahead of the selected trip schedule or behind the selected trip schedule. An output signal indicates whether the transit vehicle is ahead of or behind schedule.