Transition Module Segmentation for Optical Material Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for simulating the interaction of electromagnetic radiation with materials, particularly nonlinear optical materials, are complex, computationally expensive, and lack user-friendly software to model both linear and nonlinear interactions, including energy transfer and up-conversion processes, making it difficult to design and test photonics-based materials efficiently.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based method and system using graphical user interfaces to simulate electromagnetic radiation interactions with materials by dividing the process into simple computational transition modules, including absorption, relaxation, electron transfer, energy transfer, and up-conversion processes, allowing users to visualize and modify energy level diagrams and transition modules to determine electronic populations and optical properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional techniques for simulating nonlinear response of materials are used, then computational accuracy can be achieved, but device complexity and implementation difficulty increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational accuracyVSAvoidsoftware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the complex simulation process into separate computational blocks: propagation block for electromagnetic radiation propagation and transition blocks for various optical transitions (absorption, emission, scattering, etc.). This segmentation allows each block to be independently developed, tested, and combined, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal framework that can handle multiple types of optical interactions through a single software architecture. The same propagation block works with different transition blocks for various materials and processes, making the software versatile without requiring separate programs for each simulation type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If conventional simulation methods are used, then specific material characteristics can be modeled, but adaptability to different material compositions and optical interactions is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracy for specific materialsVSAvoidapplicability to different materials
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent separates material-specific transition processes from the general propagation framework. Users can select different transition blocks (absorption, emission, scattering) and combine them with propagation blocks to simulate various material compositions and optical interactions using the same base software architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent allows users to adjust parameters such as wavelength, material composition, and optical properties to model different scenarios. The software can accommodate changes in material characteristics without requiring fundamental algorithm changes, enhancing adaptability while maintaining model accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If traditional propagation/transmission analyses are used, then simplified calculations can be performed, but measurement precision is reduced due to neglect of molecular excited states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation speedVSAvoidaccuracy of transmission analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the simulation into propagation and transition components, allowing the propagation block to maintain computational efficiency while the transition blocks handle complex molecular excited state processes. This separation enables detailed modeling without proportionally increasing overall computational cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a balanced approach by including only the necessary transition processes for each specific simulation case. Users can select which transition blocks to activate based on the material and optical conditions, avoiding unnecessary computational complexity while maintaining sufficient precision for accurate results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive modeling of multiple transition processes is implemented, then accuracy of simulating complex optical interactions is improved, but computational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of optical interaction simulationVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides computational tasks into separate blocks that can be selectively activated. Users can combine only the necessary propagation and transition blocks for their specific simulation needs, reducing overall computational cost while maintaining accuracy for the modeled processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent provides flexibility in selecting which transition processes to model based on the specific application. Users can activate only the necessary transition blocks (e.g., absorption only, or absorption plus emission) to balance computational cost with the required level of accuracy for their particular optical interaction simulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach simplifies the simulation of complex material interactions, enabling faster and more accurate design of photonics-based materials by providing a unified framework for modeling linear and nonlinear optical processes, including energy transfer and up-conversion, and accounting for multiple compositions and layers.

Implementation Method 1

Each transition module is associated with at least one parameter and represents an electronic transition in the material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 2

Energy transfer is the transfer of energy from a first electron in a first molecule or optically responsive material to a second electron in a second molecule or energy acceptor material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy transfer:

Implementation Method 3

Up-conversion is an electronic process in which two energetically excited electrons exchange energy, wherein the first electron gains energy and goes to a higher energy level and the second electron loses an equal amount of energy and goes to a lower energy level

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUp-conversion:

Data Source

PatentUS8812252B2Determining the interaction between electromagnetic radiation and a material by utilizing transition modules
Publication Date: 2014.08.19 SIMPHOTEK
  • US8812252B2 patent drawing
  • US8812252B2 patent drawing
  • US8812252B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is a method, a system and a software arrangement that can be used to determine the interaction between electromagnetic radiation and a material. The invention simplifies the process of determining the interaction by separating the complex process into a plurality of simple transition modules. Each transition module is associated with at least one parameter and represents an electronic transition in the material.