Machine Translation Language Swap Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Machine translation errors occur due to incorrect specification of source and target languages, leading to inaccurate translations, especially when users mistakenly specify languages, and existing swap functions are inappropriate during typing or when auto-detection is enabled, causing uncertainty in language accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented technique that determines whether to swap source and target languages based on language models, confidence scores, and typing status, allowing for automatic swapping of languages and content, with options for users to manually swap or reset translations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the system automatically swaps source and target languages to correct user errors, then translation accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases due to language detection and swap determination mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-correction by automatically detecting language errors and swapping source/target languages without user intervention. The language detection mechanism and swap determination logic enable the system to identify and correct user mistakes autonomously, improving translation accuracy while maintaining a simple user interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses language detection results as feedback to determine whether a swap is needed. By continuously monitoring language confidence scores and comparing them against thresholds, the system adjusts its translation process dynamically, correcting errors while managing complexity through conditional logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system performs language swap determination during typing, then translation accuracy is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs language swap determination periodically based on typing status rather than continuously. By checking language confidence scores at specific intervals (e.g., when typing pauses or reaches certain milestones), the system balances accuracy improvement with minimal disruption to the user's typing flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its language detection frequency based on typing status. When the user is actively typing, the system minimizes interruptions; when typing pauses or completes, the system performs more thorough language detection and swap determination, optimizing the balance between accuracy and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system provides both automatic swap and manual swap options, then user control is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to additional options

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines automatic and manual swap functionalities into a single unified interface. The language swap determination mechanism operates automatically in the background, while also providing users with manual swap controls when needed. This multi-functionality approach allows the system to serve both automatic correction and user-initiated swap needs without requiring separate interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9524293B2Techniques for automatically swapping languages and/or content for machine translation
Publication Date: 2016.12.20 GOOGLE LLC
  • US9524293B2 patent drawing
  • US9524293B2 patent drawing
  • US9524293B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented technique can include receiving a machine translation input specifying (i) a source text, (ii) a source language of the source text, and (iii) a target language for the source text, and obtaining a machine translation of the source text from the source language to the target language to obtain a translated source text. The technique can include determining whether to swap the source and target languages based on (i) the source text and (ii) at least one language model, and in response to determining to swap the source and target languages: swapping the source and target languages to obtain modified source and target languages, utilizing the translated source text as a modified source text, obtaining a machine translation of the modified source text from the modified source language to the modified target language to obtain a translated modified source text, and outputting the translated modified source text.