User Interface for Natural Language Translation Using Attributes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional automatic document translation systems lack customization and flexibility in balancing translation adequacy and fluency, often failing to meet the expectations of the target audience, leading to suboptimal translations.

Innovation Solution

A user interface-driven approach that allows users to select translation attributes such as adequacy or fluency, with the system analyzing and adjusting the translation accordingly, using machine translation and context settings to optimize the translation based on user preferences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional machine translators are used, then translation speed and cost-effectiveness are improved, but translation adequacy and fluency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation speedVSAvoidtranslation adequacy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts translation parameters and attributes based on user input and document characteristics. The machine translator is configured with adjustable attributes (such as formality level, literalness, and fluency) that can be modified during the translation process to optimize both speed and quality according to specific needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the parameters of the translation system by introducing configurable attributes that control the translation process. These attributes allow the system to adjust the balance between translation speed and quality metrics like adequacy and fluency, resolving the contradiction by making the translation process adaptable to different requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If traditional machine translators are used, then translation cost is reduced, but translation quality and audience satisfaction worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation costVSAvoidtranslation quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables users to self-configure translation attributes based on their specific needs and constraints. By allowing end-users to adjust translation parameters without requiring expert intervention or manual post-editing, the system maintains cost-effectiveness while improving translation quality to meet audience expectations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The translation system dynamically adapts to different user needs and document types by adjusting its attributes in real-time. This dynamic capability allows the system to maintain high translation quality across diverse scenarios without proportionally increasing costs, as the automation handles the adaptation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If traditional machine translators are used, then translation process is simplified, but flexibility and customization worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation process simplicityVSAvoidtranslation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The machine translator is designed with multi-functionality, serving both simple and complex translation needs through a single unified system. The configurable attributes allow the same translation engine to adapt to various document types, languages, and quality requirements without requiring separate specialized tools, thus maintaining simplicity while enhancing flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The translation system dynamically adjusts its behavior based on the specific translation task and user preferences. The configurable attributes enable the system to simplify the process for straightforward translations while providing advanced customization options when needed, all within a single operational framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If single target translation is produced, then translation efficiency is improved, but meeting audience expectations worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation efficiencyVSAvoidaudience expectation alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically determines the appropriate translation attributes based on the target audience and document context. By automatically analyzing the source document and applying relevant attribute configurations, the system produces translations that are both efficient to generate and well-aligned with audience expectations, resolving the contradiction between speed and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The translation system incorporates feedback mechanisms that allow it to learn from and adapt to audience responses and document characteristics. This feedback loop enables the system to refine its attribute selections over time, improving both translation efficiency and audience satisfaction simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11132517B2User interface for natural language translation using user provided attributes
Publication Date: 2021.09.28 LENOVO SWITZERLAND INTERNATIONAL GMBH
  • US11132517B2 patent drawing
  • US11132517B2 patent drawing
  • US11132517B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An approach is provided to use a first translation attribute that is received at a user interface from a user to automatically translate a document. The source document that is in a source natural language is translated to a target document that is in a target natural language by using a machine translator that utilizes the first translation attribute, such as adequacy or fluency. The target document is analyzed with the analysis resulting in a second translation attribute (e.g., either adequacy or fluency, whichever is different from the first translation attribute). The target (translated) document and the second translation attribute are then provided to the user, such as at the user interface.