Electromagnetic Translator Auto-Braking Under Control Loss

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Systems like free piston machines without mechanical constraints rely heavily on real-time control, and the loss of control can lead to catastrophic behavior, especially in multiphase electromagnetic machines where synchronization between piston assemblies is crucial.

Innovation Solution

A linear generator system that includes a linear multiphase electromagnetic machine with a translator and a stator, coupled with power electronics and control circuitry. The control circuitry detects fault events and uses electromagnetic techniques to brake the translator, determining the appropriate technique based on the fault type and availability of operating parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If real-time control is used in free piston machines, then system operation and synchronization are maintained, but loss of control leads to catastrophic behavior

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation reliabilityVSAvoidcatastrophic behavior upon control loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by implementing an auto-braking mechanism that automatically activates when control is lost or faults occur. The braking force is pre-configured to oppose and counteract the translator's motion, preventing catastrophic behavior before it can occur. The control circuitry detects control loss conditions and immediately applies electromagnetic braking to shrink the translator's trajectory and bring it to a safe stop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful effect of uncontrolled translator motion into a beneficial outcome by using the electromagnetic machine's own structure to generate braking force. When control is lost, the system utilizes the stator and translator interaction to create a shrinking trajectory effect, transforming the potential disaster of runaway motion into a controlled, predictable shutdown.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Adaptability or versatility

If mechanical constraints are removed to enable free piston operation, then system flexibility and adaptability improve, but control complexity and safety requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem flexibilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical constraint systems with electromagnetic control and auto-braking mechanisms. Instead of using physical stops, guides, or mechanical linkages to control translator motion, the system uses electromagnetic forces generated by the stator windings and control circuitry. This substitution maintains the flexibility of free piston operation while providing precise control and automatic safety braking without complex mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If extensive real-time control is implemented, then translator motion is precisely managed, but fault management becomes more critical and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslator motion precisionVSAvoidfault management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the fault management function from the overall control system by implementing a dedicated auto-braking mechanism that operates independently upon detection of control loss or faults. The control circuitry monitors for fault conditions and automatically triggers the braking sequence, separating the safety function from the primary motion control. This extraction simplifies fault management by creating a specialized, autonomous safety subsystem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Stability of the object's composition

If synchronization is maintained in multiphase systems, then system coordination improves, but loss of synchronization leads to unpredictable behavior

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization stabilityVSAvoidsystem predictability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the unpredictable behavior resulting from synchronization loss into a predictable, controlled shutdown. When phase synchronization is lost or faults occur, the auto-braking mechanism activates to create a shrinking trajectory, transforming the potential for chaotic, unpredictable translator motion into a controlled, predictable deceleration and stop sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively manages fault events by automatically braking the translator, ensuring safe and predictable shutdown or reduction in motion, even in the absence of position information, thus preventing catastrophic failures.

Implementation Method 1

The control circuitry is configured to, in response to detecting the fault event, cause a current to be applied to a phase of the multiphase electromagnetic machine to cause a force acting on the translator that opposes an axial motion of the translator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS12283911B2Auto-braking for an electromagnetic machine
Publication Date: 2025.04.22 MAINSPRING ENERGY INC
  • US12283911B2 patent drawing
  • US12283911B2 patent drawing
  • US12283911B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for braking a translator of a linear multiphase electromagnetic machine. The system detects a fault event. A polarity indicative of an electromotive force in determined in at least one phase of the linear multiphase electromagnetic machine caused by a motion of the translator. In response to detecting the fault event, the system causes, based on the polarity, a current to be applied to a respective phase of the at least one phase to cause a force acting on the translator that opposes an axial motion of the translator to cause the translator to brake. Braking includes causing the translator to reciprocate at a reduced velocity by opposing axial motion over one or more cycles. The system may use one or more of position information, current information, operating parameters, to brake, or may brake the translator independent of such information.