Automated Translator Selection via Profile Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine translation programs are inadequate for translating difficult or less-studied languages, particularly for formal and informal communications, and human translators cannot ensure constant availability and quick response for internet applications.

Innovation Solution

A data-driven automated system selects profiles of translation professionals by matching subject area expertise, using machine learning for quality evaluation and workflow planning to optimize translation resources and workflow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If machine translation programs are used, then translation speed and availability are improved, but translation accuracy for difficult or less-studied languages deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation speedVSAvoidtranslation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a human-in-the-loop intermediary system where machine translation outputs are reviewed and corrected by human translators. The system automatically selects appropriate human translators based on subject matter expertise and uses their corrections to improve future machine translations, thereby maintaining high speed while improving accuracy for difficult languages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The translation process is segmented into multiple stages: initial machine translation, quality assessment, selective human review based on subject matter expertise, and correction. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high throughput for straightforward translations while applying human expertise only where needed, resolving the contradiction between speed and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If human translators are used, then translation accuracy for difficult languages is improved, but availability and response time deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation accuracyVSAvoidavailability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies human translation effort partially - only for segments or documents that require it based on subject matter analysis and quality assessment. Most translations proceed through machine translation alone, while human translators are engaged only when needed, maintaining both accuracy and availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the translation request to assess subject matter expertise requirements and estimated quality needs before engaging human translators. This preliminary action allows the system to prepare appropriate human translator selections in advance, ensuring both accuracy and rapid response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If manual parameter adjustment is used for translator selection, then matching accuracy is improved, but system complexity and operational burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematching accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically analyzing translation requests, identifying subject matter requirements, selecting appropriate human translators based on their profiles and expertise, and evaluating translation quality without manual intervention. This automation maintains high matching accuracy while eliminating operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where translation outcomes are automatically evaluated and used to refine future translator selections and machine translation models. This automated feedback mechanism improves matching accuracy over time without requiring manual parameter adjustment, reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10740558B2Translating a current document using a planned workflow associated with a profile of a translator automatically selected by comparing terms in previously translated documents with terms in the current document
Publication Date: 2020.08.11 SMARTCAT GROUP INC
  • US10740558B2 patent drawing
  • US10740558B2 patent drawing
  • US10740558B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for translating a current electronic document is disclosed that includes storing previous translations of prior electronic documents for profiles of translation professionals, extracting terms from prior electronic documents, and generating glossaries that are each associated with one of the profiles and include a respective subset of terms. The method also includes receiving a request to translate the current electronic document, selecting one or more of the profiles based on proximity of the respective subset of terms to extracted terms of the current electronic document, evaluating qualities of the previous translations for each of the selected profiles, planning a workflow for translation of the current electronic document based on the selected profiles, and causing the current electronic document to be translated according to the planned workflow.