Automatic Transmission Downshift Control Using Anticipated Speed

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automatic transmissions in manual mode often refuse downshifts during strong braking, failing to account for vehicle deceleration and resulting in delayed gear changes, which are unsatisfactory for sporty driving.

Innovation Solution

The calculation of predicted engine speed is modified to include anticipated speed based on vehicle deceleration, actual speed, and current gear, allowing downshifts at higher engine speeds by using an anticipated speed value that is lower than the actual instantaneous speed, thus authorizing gear changes prohibited by the static threshold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the static downgrade authorization threshold is used to control downshifts in manual mode, then the transmission control is simple and reliable, but the driver cannot downshift at high engine speeds during strong deceleration, resulting in poor sporty driving performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual mode downshift responsivenessVSAvoiddownshift authorization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates an anticipated engine speed that is lower than the actual instantaneous speed, representing a future state after deceleration. This preliminary calculation allows the control system to authorize downshifts in advance based on the anticipated speed being below the threshold, rather than waiting for the actual speed to drop. The offset between actual and anticipated speed creates a time buffer that compensates for the gear change latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a static threshold comparison (actual speed vs. fixed threshold) to a dynamic assessment that incorporates vehicle deceleration rate. The anticipated speed is calculated by applying an offset to the actual speed, where the offset magnitude depends on the deceleration rate. This dynamic approach allows the system to adapt to varying driving conditions and driver intentions in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Speed

If gear changes are executed immediately when the threshold is met, then the response is fast, but the engine speed after downshift may exceed the maximum threshold, causing unacceptable noise and vibration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegear change response speedVSAvoidengine noise and vibration
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs a preliminary check using the anticipated engine speed (which is lower than actual speed) to authorize downshifts in advance. By the time the actual gear change executes, the vehicle deceleration has reduced the engine speed, so the final speed after downshift falls within the acceptable range, avoiding noise and vibration issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies a counteracting offset to the actual speed to generate a lower anticipated speed value. This preliminary anti-action compensates for the speed increase that would otherwise occur during downshift, allowing the system to authorize changes that would normally be prohibited by the static threshold.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Reliability

If the system waits for actual speed to drop below the threshold before authorizing downshift, then the engine speed remains within acceptable limits, but the gear change latency causes poor driving experience during strong braking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine speed threshold complianceVSAvoidgear change latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control system authorizes downshifts in advance by comparing the anticipated engine speed (actual speed minus offset) with the maximum authorized speed. This preliminary authorization based on predicted future state allows the gear change to begin earlier, reducing the perceived latency while ensuring that the final engine speed after downshift will be within acceptable limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2956691B1Method for controlling downshifts of an automatic transmission in manual mode
Publication Date: 2017.06.14 RENAULT SA
  • EP2956691B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP2956691B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2956691B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Method for controlling downshifts of an automatic transmission in manual mode, in which the downshift is permitted by comparing a predicted engine speed in gear n‑1, which is calculated as a function of the speed of the vehicle in this gear, against a permitted engine speed threshold, in which method the downshift is authorized if the predicted engine speed is below the authorization threshold and is forbidden if not, characterized in that, during sharp decelerations, the actual value of the speed is replaced in the calculation of predicted engine speed in gear n‑1 by an anticipated value that is a function of: - the deceleration of the vehicle, - the actual speed, and - the current gear.