Automatic Transmission Multiple Downshifting Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multi-speed automatic transmissions face challenges in minimizing wear and energy consumption due to increased friction and engagement cycles, while maintaining predetermined shift sequences and avoiding disturbances during downshifting, which can lead to lag in ideal speed ratio selection and increased fuel consumption.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method that allows multiple downshifting, such as double downshifting, by temporarily inhibiting upshifts and skipping intermediate ratios, which reduces wear and energy expenditure, and is controlled by predetermined conditions like accelerator pedal position, braking, and vehicle mode, using an electronic control unit to manage these conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sequential downshifting through all intermediate speed ratios is commanded, then the transmission follows a predetermined shift sequence, but the shift time increases and the selected speed ratio lags behind the ideal speed ratio

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredetermined shift sequence complianceVSAvoidshift time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies skipping by allowing the transmission to bypass intermediate speed ratios during downshifting when specific conditions are met. Instead of sequentially engaging each intermediate ratio, the system can skip directly to the target lower ratio, thereby reducing shift time and preventing lag behind the ideal speed ratio while still maintaining reliability through conditional control logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple engagement and disengagement cycles are executed to accommodate many speed ratios, then the transmission provides more individually selectable speed ratios, but wear of friction material increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of speed ratiosVSAvoidfriction material wear
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges adjacent speed ratios into broader ratio ranges that can be covered by fewer clutch and brake engagements. By consolidating the control strategy to engage fewer friction elements for longer duration, the system maintains adaptability across multiple speed ratios while significantly reducing the number of engagement cycles and corresponding friction material wear

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple engagement and disengagement cycles are executed, then the transmission accommodates more speed ratios, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of speed ratiosVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges adjacent speed ratios into broader ranges that require fewer hydraulic pressure generation cycles. By consolidating the control strategy to engage fewer friction elements for longer duration, the system maintains adaptability across multiple speed ratios while significantly reducing the number of engagement cycles and corresponding energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If sequential downshifting is commanded, then the transmission follows a predetermined shift sequence, but disturbances are generated noticeable to vehicle occupants

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredetermined shift sequence complianceVSAvoiddisturbances to vehicle occupants
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies skipping by allowing the transmission to bypass intermediate speed ratios during downshifting when specific conditions are met. Instead of sequentially engaging each intermediate ratio, the system can skip directly to the target lower ratio, thereby reducing shift time and preventing lag behind the ideal speed ratio while still maintaining reliability through conditional control logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS10024424B2Method and apparatus for downshifting an automatic vehicle transmission
Publication Date: 2018.07.17 JAGUAR LAND ROVER LTD
  • US10024424B2 patent drawing
  • US10024424B2 patent drawing
  • US10024424B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-speed automatic vehicle transmission has an electronic control unit which permits multiple downshifts if certain conditions are satisfied. Such downshifts are direct and omit engagement and disengagement of one or more intermediate speed ratios. Multiple downshifting may allow the actual speed ratio to better match the ideal speed ratio, for example under heavy braking.