Digital Measurement Transmitter Clock Failure Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Digital measurement transmitters in safety-relevant applications face challenges in reliably detecting microprocessor malfunctions, particularly in scenarios where the measurement signal current falls outside the standard 4-20 mA range, necessitating a robust method to signal errors.

Innovation Solution

A digital measurement transmitter design incorporating a microprocessor, monitoring circuit, comparator circuit, and current controller to output a reset signal when the clock signal is lost, triggering an error signal current outside the standard range (e.g., 22 mA) via a comparator and operational amplifiers, ensuring reliable malfunction detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If a digital measurement transmitter uses a microprocessor for conditioning measurement signals, then measurement functionality and control capability are improved, but the ability to reliably detect microprocessor malfunctions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement signal conditioningVSAvoidmalfunction detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring circuit continuously checks the clock signal from the microprocessor in advance to detect malfunctions before they affect measurement accuracy. By preemptively monitoring the clock signal, the system can identify microprocessor failures early and switch to backup functionality, ensuring reliable detection without compromising the automated measurement signal conditioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If the measurement signal current is kept within the standard 4-20 mA range, then compatibility with standard industrial systems is improved, but the ability to signal errors distinctly deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with standard systemsVSAvoiderror signal distinction
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains the standard 4-20 mA current range for normal measurement signals to ensure compatibility with standard industrial systems. However, it introduces a distinct error signal current (e.g., 22 mA) specifically for malfunction indication. This local differentiation allows the system to preserve adaptability while achieving precise error signal distinction through the dedicated error current level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If a monitoring circuit continuously checks the clock signal, then malfunction detection capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemalfunction detectionVSAvoidcircuit structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring circuit serves as an intermediary between the microprocessor's clock signal and the error indication system. It continuously checks the clock signal and, upon detecting a malfunction, activates the error signal current without requiring complex intervention. This intermediary approach improves malfunction detection while minimizing device complexity by using a dedicated monitoring circuit rather than embedding complex monitoring logic throughout the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If the error signal current is set outside the 4-20 mA range (e.g., 22 mA), then error detection accuracy is improved, but the risk of false error signals increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection accuracyVSAvoidfalse error signals
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback through the monitoring circuit to distinguish between genuine errors and transient disturbances. When the clock signal fails, the monitoring circuit detects this through the intermediary monitoring stage and only then activates the error signal current. This feedback mechanism ensures that the error signal current outside the 4-20 mA range is activated only for genuine malfunctions, improving error detection accuracy while minimizing false error signals through continuous verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7928742B2Digital measurement transmitter with current signal
Publication Date: 2011.04.19 ENDRESS & HAUSER GMBH & CO KG
  • US7928742B2 patent drawing
  • US7928742B2 patent drawing
  • US7928742B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A measurement transmitter, including: A microprocessor having a reset input and a clock output for providing a periodic clock signal; a monitoring circuit having a clock signal input and a reset output; and a current controller for issuing in a band range, during operation, a measurement signal current representing a measured value. The clock signal input is connected with the clock signal output and the reset input with the reset output. Upon absence of the clock signal, the reset output periodically issues a reset signal. The measurement transmitter further includes a comparator circuit having a first input, which is connected via a lowpass with the reset output of the monitoring circuit, and a second input, on which a reference voltage is applied. An output of the comparator circuit is connected with the current controller. After repeated output of the reset signal, the voltage at the first input of the comparator circuit moves above the reference voltage, so that a control signal is then present on the output of the comparator. The control signal causes the current controller to issue an error signal outside of the band range.