Transmitter Receiver Localization for CGR Content Anchoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional models for anchoring digital content to reality in CGR systems face challenges such as privacy concerns and the question of who determines relevant digital content for observers.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a transmitter and receiver localization system that uses light-based unidirectional transmitters and steerable receivers to encode and decode digital information specific to the transmitter, allowing for the estimation of direction and distance, and simplifying the processing of digital content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional referential models (QR codes, BLE devices) are used to anchor digital content to reality, then content delivery is simplified, but privacy concerns arise and control over content relevance is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent delivery simplicityVSAvoidprivacy concerns
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional model by placing the transmitter (content source) rather than the receiver (observer) at the center of the system. Transmitters broadcast content and metadata including location information, while receivers passively receive and filter content based on their own location data. This inversion shifts control to observers who can determine relevance locally without exposing their position to content providers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables receivers to autonomously determine content relevance by comparing their location against location data embedded in transmitted content metadata. Observers independently filter and select content without requiring centralized control or disclosure of their position to content providers, achieving self-service content selection that preserves privacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If algorithmic models with machine vision algorithms are used to parse sensor data and identify objects, then content relevance can be determined, but computational load at the receiver increases and privacy issues persist

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent relevance determinationVSAvoidreceiver computational load
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by embedding location metadata and content identification information in the transmitted signal before reception. Receivers don't need to perform complex image parsing or object identification algorithms; instead, they directly use the pre-packaged location data from multiple transmitters to determine content relevance, dramatically reducing computational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex machine vision algorithms (mechanical/optical processing) with a computational geometry approach using triangulation and multilateration. Instead of parsing visual data to identify objects, the receiver uses mathematical calculations on signal strength and time-of-flight data from multiple transmitters to directly compute location and determine content relevance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If transmitters broadcast location information to enable content delivery, then content anchoring to reality is achieved, but observer privacy is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent anchoring accuracyVSAvoidobserver location privacy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the information flow by having transmitters broadcast their location data rather than receivers transmitting their location. Content providers (transmitters) voluntarily disclose their position information in broadcast signals, while observers (receivers) maintain privacy by not exposing their location to content providers. This inversion achieves reliable content anchoring while preserving observer anonymity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses an intermediary approach where location information is embedded in the content metadata itself rather than being exchanged directly between observers and content providers. Receivers obtain location data from the transmitted signal and independently perform location matching, acting as an intermediary that protects both transmitter location disclosure and receiver privacy simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12320896B1Transmitter and receiver localization
Publication Date: 2025.06.03 APPLE INC
  • US12320896B1 patent drawing
  • US12320896B1 patent drawing
  • US12320896B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for transmitter and receiver localization within an environment. A transmitter transmits a signal that includes information (e.g., wavelength, polarization, and/or modulation) that varies based on observation angle. Receiver(s) may estimate direction of the transmitter in the environment based on the received signal. Intensity of the signal may be used to determine distance of the transmitter to the receiver(s). The receiver(s) may then convey the respective estimated distance and direction to the transmitter, for example via a wireless connection. The transmitter may then generate a map of the respective distances and directions to receiver(s) in the environment, and may convey absolute location and orientation of the transmitter in the environment to the receiver(s), for example via a wireless connection.