Transmitter-Directed Wireless Security Format Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless communication systems face challenges in providing simultaneous protection against jamming and geolocation threats due to the complexity of synchronization requirements in traditional spread spectrum techniques, which are often cumbersome and inflexible, and lack adaptability to varying conditions.

Innovation Solution

A transmitter-directed transmission security method that dynamically selects the transmission format for each data frame based on a transmission security scenario, using techniques such as frequency hopping, direct sequence spreading, permutation of modulation and coding formats, and other parameters on a packet-by-packet basis, allowing for adaptation to changing conditions and threats.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional spread spectrum techniques are used to protect against jamming, then transmission security is improved, but device complexity and synchronization requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission securityVSAvoidsynchronization requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic selection of transmission formats (spread spectrum, non-spread spectrum, modulation schemes, coding rates) based on real-time security scenario assessments. The transmitter dynamically adapts its transmission characteristics rather than using fixed spread spectrum techniques, reducing synchronization complexity while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes transmission parameters (spreading factor, modulation type, coding rate, frequency hopping pattern) based on the security scenario. When jamming threats are detected, spread spectrum parameters are adjusted; when geolocation threats are present, non-spread spectrum modes may be selected, thereby adapting security measures to specific threats without constant high-complexity synchronization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If spread spectrum encoding is used to provide transmission security, then protection against interception is improved, but adaptability to varying conditions decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against interceptionVSAvoidadaptability to varying conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The transmission format selector dynamically chooses between spread spectrum and non-spread spectrum modes, and adjusts modulation and coding parameters based on channel conditions, data priority, and security requirements. This enables the system to adapt to varying conditions while maintaining protection against interception when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates multiple transmission modes (spread spectrum, frequency hopping, direct sequence, OFDM, single-carrier) within a single transmitter framework. This multi-functional capability allows the system to provide protection against interception through spread spectrum when required, while also adapting to other conditions using alternative modes, thereby achieving both security and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If predefined fixed keys are used in spread spectrum systems, then key distribution complexity is reduced, but vulnerability to key disclosure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekey distributionVSAvoidsecurity vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The transmitter generates and manages its own transmission format selections and security parameters based on assessed security scenarios. Rather than relying on pre-distributed keys that must be kept secret, the system self-determines its transmission characteristics, reducing key distribution complexity while maintaining security through dynamic adaptation rather than static key secrecy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If synchronization sources and preamble sequences are added to spread spectrum systems, then synchronization accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects between spread spectrum and non-spread spectrum transmission modes. When non-spread spectrum modes are selected, simplified synchronization mechanisms can be used, reducing the need for complex synchronization sources and preamble sequences while maintaining adequate synchronization accuracy for the selected mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8358613B1Transmitter-directed security for wireless-communications
Publication Date: 2013.01.22 L3 TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US8358613B1 patent drawing
  • US8358613B1 patent drawing
  • US8358613B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Transmitter-directed transmission security is provided between a transmit node and a receive node. The transmit node selects transmission format for each data frame based on a transmission security scenario. Information related to the transmission format is communicated between the transmit node and the receive node, and the data frames are transmitted over a wireless communication link using the selected transmission formats.