Transmitter-Threshold Neural Model for Adaptive Low-Complexity Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing neurocomputational models are susceptible to underfitting, leading to high complexity and resource consumption, and struggle to adapt to dynamic environments due to rigidity and difficulty in accounting for environmental variability.

Innovation Solution

A trivial transmitter model comprising source, interneuron, and motor units that dynamically adjust transmitter quantities to automate processes, using a computing system to manage and configure neural networks efficiently, allowing for plasticity events to maintain balance and adapt to environmental changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If known neurocomputational models are used to achieve high performance, then performance is improved, but device complexity and resource consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveperformanceVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates unnecessary computational components from complex neurocomputational models, retaining only the essential transmitter-receiver mechanisms needed for basic neural processing. This extraction reduces model complexity while preserving core functional capabilities, directly addressing the contradiction between performance and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs simplified, lightweight transmitter and receiver components that can be easily instantiated and discarded, replacing heavy computational structures. These simple objects achieve the necessary computational functionality with minimal resource consumption, resolving the trade-off between performance and resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Reliability

If known neurocomputational models are used to achieve high performance, then performance is improved, but energy consumption increases substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveperformanceVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes energy-intensive computational operations from complex neural models, retaining only the essential signal transmission and reception mechanisms. This extraction dramatically reduces energy consumption while maintaining the core processing capabilities needed for neural network functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses low-cost, low-energy transmitter and receiver components that consume minimal power compared to traditional neural network processors. These simple objects achieve the necessary computational tasks with substantially reduced energy consumption, directly addressing the performance-energy contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Productivity

If known neurocomputational models are used, then processing capability is achieved, but adaptability to dynamic environments is reduced due to rigidity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capabilityVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustability in the transmitter-receiver system, allowing connection strengths and transmission parameters to be modified in real-time based on environmental conditions. This dynamic capability enables the system to adapt to changing environments while maintaining processing functionality, resolving the rigidity problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables continuous adjustment of key parameters such as transmitter release rates, receiver sensitivity thresholds, and connection weights. These parameter changes allow the system to adapt to different environmental conditions and task requirements, directly improving adaptability while preserving processing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260002827A1Trivial transmitter model
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 TROCCOLI STEVEN J
  • US20260002827A1 patent drawing
  • US20260002827A1 patent drawing
  • US20260002827A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A trivial transmitter model enables processes to be automated and/or networks to be managed efficiently and reliably. The trivial transmitter model includes one or more interneuron units that receive a quantity of transmitters including at least a portion of a first quantity of a source transmitter released by a source unit, determine a second quantity of an interneuron transmitter based on the quantity of received transmitters including at least the portion of the first quantity of the source transmitter, and release the second quantity of the interneuron transmitter, wherein the second quantity of the interneuron transmitter is configured to perform an action upon satisfying a predetermined threshold.