Transplant Compatibility Interface for Multi-Indicator Donor Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining transplant compatibility between donors and recipients are limited in their ability to efficiently integrate and visualize diverse compatibility indicators from multiple sources, leading to suboptimal donor selection.

Innovation Solution

A system and process that obtains and integrates HLA typing data from various sources, generating a user interface (UI) that displays compatibility indicators, such as T-cell, B-cell, and peptide compatibility, allowing for comprehensive visual comparison of potential donors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple datasets from different sources are integrated to provide comprehensive compatibility indicators, then the accuracy and completeness of transplant compatibility assessment is improved, but the system complexity and difficulty of data integration increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility assessment accuracyVSAvoiddata integration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides compatibility assessment into multiple independent datasets from different sources (HLA typing, T-cell compatibility, B-cell compatibility, peptide alignment), each processed and visualized separately in the UI, allowing comprehensive assessment without requiring complex integration of all data at once

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The user interface acts as an intermediary layer that receives data from multiple sources, processes it into standardized visual representations, and presents it to users in a unified manner, shielding users from the underlying data integration complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If comprehensive compatibility indicators from multiple sources are provided, then the information completeness for donor selection is improved, but the time and effort required to analyze the data increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility information completenessVSAvoiddata analysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms complex compatibility data into visual representations (tables, graphs, color-coded indicators) in the user interface, adding a visual dimension that allows users to quickly comprehend comprehensive compatibility information without requiring detailed analysis of raw data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-processes and organizes compatibility data from multiple sources before presentation, calculating compatibility indicators and structuring data in ready-to-analyze formats, so users receive pre-processed information that reduces their analysis time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If detailed compatibility indicators are displayed in a single interface, then the ease of operation for comparing donors is improved, but the interface complexity and number of elements to display increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedonor comparison convenienceVSAvoiduser interface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The user interface is segmented into distinct sections for different compatibility indicators (HLA typing comparison, T-cell compatibility, B-cell compatibility, peptide alignment), with each section independently organized and visualized, allowing users to focus on specific aspects without being overwhelmed by all data at once

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the interface use different visualization strategies appropriate to the data type (tables for HLA typing, graphical representations for compatibility scores, color-coding for match status), optimizing the presentation quality for each specific information type rather than using a uniform approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20260058022A1Conveying information about compatibility of a donor and receipient of a transplant
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 IMMUCOR GTI DIAGNOSTICS INC
  • US20260058022A1 patent drawing
  • US20260058022A1 patent drawing
  • US20260058022A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An example method includes obtaining information about a recipient of a transplant and a potential donor of the transplant, where the information includes an HLA (human leukocyte antigen) typing for the recipient and an HLA typing for the potential donor; obtaining multiple datasets based on the information, where each dataset includes indicators that are based on a compatibility of the potential donor to the recipient for the transplant; storing the multiple data sets in database; generating data for a user interface (UI) containing representations of the indicators from ones of the multiple datasets in the database; and outputting the data for display on a display device.