Automated Slip Transplanter Active Depth Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current transplanting machines face challenges such as increased labor costs, reduced efficiency, and inconsistent planting depths due to manual adjustments, which are prone to human error and are not suitable for variable soil conditions.

Innovation Solution

An automated slip transplanter with a planter unit, conveyor belt, and controller that implements various operational modes, including active depth control and node control, to dynamically adjust planting depths and angles in real-time, utilizing sensors to measure soil properties and optimize planting conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual adjustments are used for planting depth, then ease of operation is improved, but manufacturing precision and reliability deteriorate due to human error and inconsistency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidplanting depth consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment with an automated control system that uses sensors (optical, capacitive, or inductive depth sensors) to detect planting depth and electronically controls the planter unit through a controller, eliminating human error while maintaining operational simplicity through automated feedback control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback control mechanism where depth sensors continuously monitor the planting depth, the controller processes this information and compares it to target depth values, and automatically adjusts the planter unit position or speed to maintain consistent planting depth, thereby resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If automated depth control is implemented, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional sensors and control systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanting depth consistencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a multi-functional controller that integrates depth sensing, data processing, plant database queries for optimal depth recommendations, and actuator control into a single system, reducing overall device complexity by consolidating functions rather than using separate dedicated components for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts operating parameters such as planter unit speed, depth sensor sampling rate, and target depth values based on real-time conditions and stored plant data, allowing high precision without requiring complex hardware by using software-based parameter optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple operational modes are implemented, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional control modes and sensors

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic operational modes that can be switched based on real-time field conditions, plant type, and soil characteristics, allowing the system to adapt to varying requirements through software-controlled mode transitions rather than requiring separate dedicated hardware systems for each mode

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a database of optimal planting parameters for different plant types and soil conditions that is queried in advance to pre-configure operational parameters, enabling rapid adaptation to different planting scenarios without requiring complex real-time decision-making or additional sensing infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The automated system significantly reduces labor costs and operator hours, improves planting efficiency, and ensures consistent and optimal planting conditions by dynamically adjusting to soil variations, leading to increased crop yield and field utilization.

Implementation Method 1

The one or more sensors can include a depth sensor, a motion sensor, a photoelectric sensor, an optical encoder, a rotary sensor, and a linear potentiometer sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDepth sensing:

Implementation Method 2

The one or more sensors can include a depth sensor, a motion sensor, a photoelectric sensor, an optical encoder, a rotary sensor, and a linear potentiometer sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS20250040472A1Active Depth Control Planting Mode
Publication Date: 2025.02.06 BLACK GOLD FARMS
  • US20250040472A1 patent drawing
  • US20250040472A1 patent drawing
  • US20250040472A1 patent drawing

AI summary

System and methods are provided for transplanting slips with an automated slip transplanter. The automated slip transplanter can comprise a planter unit to receive and plant slips, a conveyor belt operably coupled to the planter unit, and a controller. The conveyor belt can be configured to transfer the slips towards the planter unit, and the controller can be configured to control the planter unit and utilize one or more operational modes for planting a plurality of rows of slips. Each of the plurality of rows of slips can include evenly spaced slips in the ground.