Transport Block Size Determination Function for 5G New Radio

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing table-based approach for determining transport block size (TBS) in 5G new radio (NR) is inefficient due to large memory requirements and does not accurately model the relationship between TBS and the number of physical resource blocks (PRBs), leading to suboptimal coding gain utilization.

Innovation Solution

A general function f(NPRB, ν, Qm, R) is introduced to determine TBS, which is a non-linear mapping of PRBs, layers, modulation bits, and coding rate, allowing for adaptive TBS determination and improved coding gain utilization through simulation-approximated formulas or mapping tables.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If table-based TBS determination is used for NR, then TBS can be determined for different PRBs, but memory requirements become very large due to the number of PRBs being much higher than LTE

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveTBS determination capabilityVSAvoidmemory requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential parameters needed for TBS determination (NPRB, ν, Qm, R) and removes the dependency on large pre-computed tables. Instead of storing complete TBS tables for all possible PRB configurations, the system extracts and stores only the core functional relationships in a compact form, significantly reducing memory requirements while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from static table lookup to dynamic parameter-based calculation. By expressing TBS as a function f(NPRB, ν, Qm, R) rather than relying on fixed tables, the system can adapt to different PRB values and channel conditions through parameter changes without requiring proportional increases in memory storage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If linear mapping with NPRB is used to reduce complexity, then memory requirements are reduced, but coding gain is not optimized because normalized TBS should increase with NPRB

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveTBS determination complexityVSAvoidcoding gain utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic behavior into the TBS determination by making the function f() adaptive to the input parameters. Rather than using a static linear mapping, the function can dynamically adjust the relationship between NPRB and TBS based on the specific values of ν, Qm, and R, allowing the normalized TBS to increase with NPRB when appropriate to capture coding gain while keeping the system relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes to transition from fixed linear mapping to adaptive mapping. By allowing the functional relationship to change based on the values of its parameters (particularly NPRB), the system can optimize coding gain utilization without requiring complex table structures, achieving a balance between simplicity and performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If large TBS tables are stored at base station or UE, then accurate TBS can be determined for all PRB values, but storage requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveTBS determination accuracyVSAvoidstorage requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a simplified copy or representation of the TBS determination logic through the function f(NPRB, ν, Qm, R). Instead of storing complete detailed tables, the system uses a compact functional representation that captures the essential relationships, providing accurate TBS determination with minimal storage requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11218243B2Transport block size determination for new radio
Publication Date: 2022.01.04 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US11218243B2 patent drawing
  • US11218243B2 patent drawing
  • US11218243B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method performed by a wireless transmitter determining a transport block size (TBS) is provided. The method includes determining a TBS using a general function of a number of physical resource blocks (PRBs) to be granted (N_PRB), a number of resource elements (REs) per PRB (N_RE{circumflex over ( )}(DL,PRB)), a number of layers per transport block (ν), a number of bits per modulation (Q_m), and a coding rate determined by a modulation coding scheme (MCS) (R), allocating a transport block of the determined TBS and transmitting the transport block to a wireless receiver. Apparatuses for implementing the method are also provide.