Dynamic Transport Distribution Management for Transit Time Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing urban transportation systems face challenges in efficiently managing transport distribution within a service zone to minimize pickup and transit times, especially in areas with varying population density and service request densities, leading to potential delays and inefficient resource allocation.

Innovation Solution

A roaming transport distribution system that dynamically allocates and redistributes transport vehicles based on real-time customer requests, population density, and traffic conditions, using GPS and wireless communication to optimize routes and coverage areas, ensuring non-overlapping service zones and meeting predetermined transit times.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If transports are uniformly distributed throughout the service zone, then coverage area is maximized, but pickup and transit times increase in high-demand areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepickup and transit timeVSAvoidresponse to varying demand patterns
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements unequal distribution of transports based on local demand characteristics. Coverage areas are dynamically adjusted so that high-density areas receive greater transport concentration while low-density areas have reduced coverage. This local adaptation allows the system to optimize pickup and transit times in high-demand zones without requiring uniform resource allocation across the entire service zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The transport distribution system continuously adapts to changing demand patterns through real-time monitoring and dynamic redistribution. Coverage areas are not static but are continuously adjusted based on current service requests, population density variations, and traffic conditions. This dynamic behavior enables the system to respond flexibly to varying demand patterns throughout different time periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If transports are concentrated in high-density areas, then service quality improves in those areas, but coverage area and accessibility to low-density areas decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice efficiency in high-demand areasVSAvoidcoverage area
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains comprehensive coverage by dynamically adjusting transport locations and coverage area boundaries. When transports are concentrated in high-density areas during peak demand periods, the system simultaneously expands or activates coverage in low-density areas through boundary adjustment and transport redistribution. This dynamic balancing ensures that while service efficiency is maximized in high-demand zones, the overall coverage area remains intact and accessible to all service zone residents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If transport locations are fixed, then system complexity is reduced, but ability to respond to real-time demand and optimize routes is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem management complexityVSAvoidreal-time service responsiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs continuous feedback loops where service requests, customer locations, and transport positions are constantly monitored and fed back to the central management system. This real-time information flow enables automatic adjustment of transport routes and coverage areas without requiring complex manual intervention. The feedback mechanism simplifies system management by using algorithmic decision-making based on current conditions while maintaining high real-time responsiveness to service demands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If coverage areas overlap between transports, then service redundancy is increased, but resource allocation efficiency and pickup time optimization is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice availabilityVSAvoidpickup time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the service zone into distinct non-overlapping coverage areas, with each transport assigned to a specific geographic region. This segmentation eliminates redundant coverage while ensuring complete area coverage through adjacent boundary definitions. By dividing the service zone into exclusive zones, the system optimizes pickup times by directing customers to the single nearest transport without confusion or duplication, while maintaining service reliability through comprehensive area coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10055804B2Roaming transport distribution management system
Publication Date: 2018.08.21 METROBEE
  • US10055804B2 patent drawing
  • US10055804B2 patent drawing
  • US10055804B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A roaming transport distribution management apparatus and method are provided. A controller selects transports within a defined service zone in response to customer transit requests from customer locations or a central hub which are capable of meeting maximum transit time to the end destination in either an inbound or outbound direction from the hub. A hub manager varies the position and/or the size of an exclusive coverage area of each transport within the overall service zone to insure a dense accumulation of transports over the entire service zone and alters the position of other transports in response to the movement of a transport inbound or outbound from the hub with a passenger. The hub manager can vary the size of the exclusive coverage area of each transport to account for population and request call densities and the number of available transports.