Transportation Service Pricing Framework for Accurate Provider Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Transportation service providers face challenges in efficiently managing and pricing student transportation services due to complex pricing agreements, diverse rider needs, and the lack of tools for optimal provider selection and cost comparison, leading to sub-optimal choices and obscured cost-value assessments.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for assessing transportation service value by establishing compound rate structures, incorporating cost-adjustment factors, and integrating real-time data processing to automate invoice generation and provider selection, enabling efficient comparison and optimization of transportation services.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual pricing and invoice generation methods are used for transportation services, then flexibility in handling diverse rider needs and pricing agreements is maintained, but operational efficiency and accuracy deteriorate due to time-consuming manual processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in handling diverse rider needsVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a universal compound rate structure that can handle multiple pricing models (per-mile, per-minute, per-ride, tiered pricing) and diverse rider classifications within a single automated framework, eliminating the need for separate manual processes for each pricing scenario

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts pricing parameters based on rider classification, trip characteristics, and selected pricing models. Cost-adjustment factors are automatically applied to base rates, allowing flexible pricing without manual intervention while maintaining operational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If complex pricing structures with multiple rate configurations are implemented to accommodate diverse transportation needs, then pricing accuracy and adaptability improve, but system complexity and difficulty of management increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepricing accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pricing system is segmented into modular components: base rate structures, cost-adjustment factors, rider classification categories, and pricing model selections. Each component can be independently configured and combined, making complex pricing manageable through systematic breakdown rather than monolithic complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The compound rate structure acts as an intermediary layer between raw trip data and final pricing. It automatically applies cost-adjustment factors and selects appropriate pricing models, serving as a mediator that simplifies the complexity of handling diverse pricing scenarios without requiring manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If automated systems are introduced to improve invoice generation efficiency, then productivity and accuracy improve, but the ability to handle unique rider-specific circumstances and pricing agreements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinvoice generation efficiencyVSAvoidability to handle unique rider circumstances
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by allowing different cost-adjustment factors and pricing models to be applied to specific rider classifications and trip characteristics. Each rider category (e.g., special needs, standard, priority) can have customized pricing parameters while the overall system remains automated and efficient

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The pricing system is dynamic rather than static. It automatically adapts to unique rider circumstances by selecting appropriate pricing models and applying relevant cost-adjustment factors based on rider classification and trip data, maintaining both automation efficiency and adaptability to individual cases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Measurement precision

If detailed tracking and monitoring of trip parameters are implemented to improve pricing accuracy, then measurement precision improves, but data processing complexity and time requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrip parameter measurement accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-configuring compound rate structures with multiple pricing models and cost-adjustment factors before actual trip processing. This preparation allows rapid automated calculation during invoice generation without requiring complex real-time analysis, reducing data processing time while maintaining precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260080443A1Method to assess value of a transportation service
Publication Date: 2026.03.19 INIGO LLC
  • US20260080443A1 patent drawing
  • US20260080443A1 patent drawing
  • US20260080443A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method to assess a value of a transportation service can include determining a first provider transportation assessment of a first provider. For example, the first provider transportation assessment can involve receiving first trip information corresponding with a specified travel period associated with the first provider and establishing a first rate configuration including a compound rate structure, the compound rate structure. The compound rate structure can include a base rate, a qualified rate, established based on values the parameters of the first trip information, and at least one cost-adjustment factor. A monetary value of the specified travel period can be terminated, such as based on first the trip information and the compound rate structure of the first rate configuration.