Transpose Convolution Kernel Segmentation for Neural Network Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Transpose convolution layers in deep learning applications are computationally intensive due to the increased feature map size caused by embedding zeros along each row and column, leading to poor hardware resource utilization and unnecessary multiplication operations.

Innovation Solution

The method segregates the original kernel into four sub-kernels based on the unsampled input feature map pattern, reducing memory requirements and computational load without the need for an upsampling layer, allowing for faster computation and memory savings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If transpose convolution uses upsampling layer to increase feature map size, then upsampling capability is improved, but computational complexity and memory requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputation speedVSAvoidhardware resource utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The kernel is segmented into four sub-kernels based on the unsampled input feature map pattern. This segmentation allows the system to process only relevant regions of the feature map, avoiding unnecessary computations on zero-padded areas while maintaining the upsampling functionality of transpose convolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method extracts and processes only the non-zero regions of the input feature map, taking out the essential computational content from the zero-padded areas. By identifying and processing only the active regions, the system achieves faster computation without requiring the full upsampled feature map, thus improving speed while reducing hardware resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Quantity of substance

If transpose convolution embeds zeros along each row and column, then upsampling is achieved, but memory requirements and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature map sizeVSAvoidcomputational load
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The kernel is divided into four sub-kernels that correspond to different regions of the input feature map. This segmentation enables the system to process only the necessary portions of the data, achieving the required feature map size expansion without computing all the zero-padded regions, thus reducing computational load while maintaining the quantity of useful output data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method performs partial action by processing only the non-zero regions of the input feature map rather than the entire upsampled feature map. This partial processing approach achieves sufficient upsampling capability for the task at hand without the excessive computational burden of processing all zero-padded areas, optimizing the balance between feature map size and computational load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If conventional transpose convolution processes entire feature map, then completeness of computation is improved, but computation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputation completenessVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The computation is segmented into four separate operations using sub-kernels, each handling specific regions of the input feature map. This segmentation maintains computation completeness by ensuring all necessary regions are processed, while simultaneously reducing computation time by avoiding redundant operations on zero-padded areas through targeted regional processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method performs preliminary identification of non-zero regions in the input feature map before executing the convolution operations. This preliminary action allows the system to prepare and execute computations only where necessary, maintaining completeness of essential computations while reducing overall computation time by eliminating unnecessary operations on zero-padded regions ahead of time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240420280A1Method for performing transpose convolution operations in a neural network
Publication Date: 2024.12.19 UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT LAFAYETTE
  • US20240420280A1 patent drawing
  • US20240420280A1 patent drawing
  • US20240420280A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An algorithmic-level optimization technique based on kernel segregation mechanisms for efficient transpose convolution implementation without requiring an upsampling layer. Experimental results showed that the proposed approach showed an average of 3.7×(3.4×) faster computation than conventional methods known in the art. The method further provides significant improvement in computation speed and substantial memory savings from the obtained results.