Folding Bicycle With Transverse Front-Wheel Folding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing folding bicycles are not satisfactory in terms of structural simplicity, folding efficiency, overall dimensions, and performance, especially when incorporating pedal assistance, jeopardizing design, weight, and performance similar to high-range bicycles.

Innovation Solution

A folding bicycle design with multiple folding axes, including a transverse second folding axis for the front wheel and a third folding axis for the seat tube, combined with a crank axle unit featuring an electric motor, allowing for compact folding and quick locking/unlocking mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If a folding bicycle uses a conventional single folding axis design, then the structure is simpler, but the overall dimensions in folded condition are larger and folding efficiency is lower

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall dimensions in folded conditionVSAvoidfolding system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The folding bicycle employs multiple folding axes (first folding axis for the rear wheel and second folding axis for the front wheel) instead of a single folding axis. This segmentation allows different parts of the bicycle to be folded independently, achieving more compact overall dimensions while maintaining structural clarity and functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a second folding axis oriented transverse to the general plane of the bicycle, adding a dimensional aspect to the folding mechanism. This transverse axis enables the front wheel to be folded perpendicular to the main folding plane, significantly reducing the folded footprint without proportionally increasing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Volume of moving object

If the front wheel is folded using a conventional single-axis system, then the folding operation is simpler, but the folded position does not achieve minimum overall dimensions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefolded position dimensionsVSAvoidfolding operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The folding operation is divided into two independent rotational movements: one around the first folding axis for the rear wheel and another around the second folding axis for the front wheel. This segmentation allows each wheel to be folded to its optimal position independently, achieving minimum overall dimensions while keeping each individual folding action relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second folding axis for the front wheel is oriented transverse to the general plane of the bicycle, enabling the front wheel to be folded in a direction perpendicular to the main folding plane. This dimensional change allows the front wheel to achieve a compact folded position alongside the rear wheel without complicating the folding operation mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If the bicycle is designed to match high-range bicycle performance and design quality, then performance and styling are improved, but weight and structural complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance and design qualityVSAvoidbicycle weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The bicycle employs dynamic folding mechanisms with articulated connections that allow the structure to adapt between folded and unfolded states. The locking and unlocking devices enable the frame to transition smoothly between configurations, maintaining high-range bicycle performance and design quality in the unfolded state while achieving compact folding without excessive weight gain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes in the folding mechanism, particularly the orientation of the second folding axis transverse to the general plane of the bicycle. This parameter change enables the front wheel to be positioned closer to or substantially coincident with the rear wheel axis in the folded condition, achieving minimum overall dimensions while maintaining design quality and performance characteristics similar to high-range non-folding bicycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4405240B1Folding bicycle, in particular bicycle with pedal assistance
Publication Date: 2025.11.05 MOV ENG SRL
  • EP4405240B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4405240B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4405240B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A folding bicycle (B) comprises a frame (T), a rear wheel (4) rotatably mounted on a rear-wheel support (5), and a front wheel (6) rotatably mounted on a front-wheel support (7). The frame (T) has at least one first, substantially vertical, folding axis (I) that enables the rear wheel (4) to be moved, together with the rear-wheel support (5) and the crank- axle unit of the bicycle (G), via a rotation through approximately 180°, from a position of normal use to a folded position in which the rear wheel (4) is substantially arranged alongside the front wheel (6). The front-wheel support (7) moreover includes a second folding axis (II) oriented in a direction transverse to the general plane of the bicycle (B), which enables the front wheel (6) to be moved from a position of normal use to a folded position in which the axis of the front wheel (6) is closer to, or substantially coincident with, the axis of the rear wheel (4) when the latter is in its folded position.