Trapping Tower for Semiconductor Reaction By-Product Capture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current reaction by-product trapping apparatuses in semiconductor manufacturing processes fail to efficiently trap particulate reaction by-products due to non-uniform flow velocities and inadequate surface area, leading to increased exhaust pressure, vacuum pump breakdowns, and contamination of wafers.

Innovation Solution

A trapping apparatus with an internal trapping tower featuring vertically arranged disc-type trapping units and a dual-structured diffuser to uniformly heat and diffuse gases, increasing residence time and surface area, and a radially arranged trapping disc with exhaust holes to concentrate and disperse gas flows, ensuring uniform temperature and flow velocity for efficient trapping of reaction by-products as a thin film.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a conventional trapping plate with holes is used, then the structure is simple, but the flow velocity is non-uniform and trapping efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrapping plate structureVSAvoidtrapping efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The trapping plate is divided into multiple trapping elements arranged in a specific pattern, where each element contributes to uniform flow distribution. This segmentation allows the system to maintain structural simplicity while achieving enhanced trapping efficiency through distributed flow management across multiple elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a conventional two-dimensional trapping plate to a three-dimensional trapping tower structure with multiple levels and layers. This dimensional expansion provides increased surface area for trapping, improved flow distribution, and better residence time characteristics while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If the trapping surface area is increased, then trapping efficiency improves, but the device size and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrapping efficiencyVSAvoidtrapping apparatus size
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The trapping tower employs a nested structure where multiple trapping elements are arranged concentrically or in layered configurations. This nesting approach maximizes the trapping surface area within a compact footprint, allowing high trapping efficiency without proportionally increasing the overall device size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

By transitioning to a vertical three-dimensional structure, the invention achieves large trapping surface area through height rather than horizontal expansion. Multiple trapping levels are stacked vertically, providing extensive trapping capacity while maintaining a compact horizontal footprint suitable for semiconductor manufacturing environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Duration of action of moving object

If gas flow velocity is reduced for better trapping, then residence time increases, but exhaust pressure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresidence timeVSAvoidexhaust pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The gas flow is segmented into multiple streams as it passes through the distributed trapping elements. This segmentation creates numerous small flow paths that collectively provide extended residence time while maintaining lower pressure drops compared to a single large flow path, thus achieving better trapping without excessive exhaust pressure buildup.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The trapping tower utilizes vertical flow progression through multiple elevated trapping levels. Gas flows upward or downward through successive stages, increasing residence time through extended vertical path length while the distributed structure prevents excessive pressure accumulation that would occur in a single-stage horizontal system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If a uniform flow velocity is achieved, then trapping efficiency improves, but the structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrapping efficiencyVSAvoidflow control structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The trapping elements are arranged in asymmetric patterns optimized for uniform flow distribution. Rather than symmetric configurations that would require complex flow control mechanisms, the asymmetric arrangement of trapping elements naturally promotes uniform velocity distribution across the flow path, achieving high trapping efficiency with simpler structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The trapping structure is designed to self-regulate flow distribution through its geometric configuration. The arrangement of trapping elements creates natural flow distribution patterns that promote uniform velocity without requiring external flow control devices or complex active control systems, thereby achieving uniform flow and high efficiency with minimal added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus effectively traps reaction by-products in a thin film form with high efficiency, reducing flow velocities and maintaining uniform temperature distribution, thereby preventing contamination and extending the surface area for improved trapping performance.

Implementation Method 1

heats the unreacted gas with a heater... maintaining uniform temperature distribution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

a dual-structured diffuser to uniformly heat and diffuse gases, increasing residence time and surface area

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 3

trap the reaction by-products with high efficiency... traps the reaction by-products in the form of a thin film

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeposition: Deposition (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS11555243B2Apparatus for trapping reaction by-product produced during organic film deposition process
Publication Date: 2023.01.17 MILAEBO
  • US11555243B2 patent drawing
  • US11555243B2 patent drawing
  • US11555243B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to an apparatus for trapping a reaction by-products produced during an organic film deposition process, and an object of the present disclosure is to provide a trapping apparatus having an internal trapping tower in which disc-type trapping units, which each have structure-type trapping plates having a large surface area per unit area in order to trap reaction by-products contained in an unreacted gas introduced into the trapping apparatus after an organic film deposition process, among semiconductor manufacturing processes, is performed in the process chamber, and a trapping disc configured to concentrate a flow of the gas or disperse or discharge the gas, are vertically arranged in multiple layers, such that the trapping apparatus traps the reaction by-products in the form of a thin film in a state in which the residence time of the gas is increased and uniform temperature distribution is maintained.