Travel Booking Search Normalization Engine

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity of airfare pricing dynamics, numerous airlines and routes, and varying user preferences lead to inefficiencies in travel booking searches, resulting in repeated queries and resource wastage due to discrepancies and overwhelming options, particularly for corporate travel.

Innovation Solution

A computing resource optimization engine that normalizes travel booking search results by parsing heterogeneous data from multiple travel actor servers, merging fare classes, and controlling a graphical interface to display relevant itineraries based on administrator-defined parameters, reducing redundant searches and optimizing resource usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If travel booking search systems query multiple travel actor servers for comprehensive itinerary options, then the completeness and variety of travel options improve, but the complexity of handling heterogeneous data formats and the computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of travel optionsVSAvoiddata format complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a normalization layer that acts as an intermediary between heterogeneous travel actor servers and the search system. This normalization layer standardizes data formats from different airlines and travel agencies into a common structure, eliminating the need to handle each provider's unique format individually while maintaining comprehensive travel options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements data normalization that converts heterogeneous data formats from multiple travel actors into a homogeneous standardized format. This allows the system to process and compare itineraries from different sources uniformly, reducing complexity while preserving the completeness of travel options across multiple providers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

2Loss of information

If the system displays all available travel itineraries with detailed parameters, then the information completeness improves, but the user interface complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments travel itinerary parameters into hierarchical groups (e.g., flight details, pricing, amenities, restrictions). This segmentation allows the system to organize comprehensive information in a structured manner, enabling efficient processing and selective display based on user preferences without overwhelming the interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic parameter display where the system adapts the level of detail shown based on user interactions and preferences. Frequently important parameters are displayed prominently while less critical details can be accessed on demand, reducing initial processing time while maintaining information completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If the system performs multiple refined searches to account for user preferences and corporate policies, then the accuracy of results improves, but the network and computing resources consumed increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresult accuracyVSAvoidnetwork and computing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary filtering of travel itineraries based on corporate policies and user preferences before conducting detailed searches. By pre-establishing constraint parameters (e.g., acceptable layover durations, preferred airlines, budget limits), the system reduces the search space early, improving result accuracy while minimizing resource consumption on subsequent refined searches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If the system normalizes heterogeneous fare classes from different travel actors, then the ease of comparison improves, but the complexity of mapping diverse fare attributes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefare comparison easeVSAvoidfare mapping complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms diverse fare class attributes from different travel actors into standardized parameters through normalization. By mapping varying fare attributes (refundability, change policies, included amenities) to a common parameter framework, the system enables easy fare comparison while managing mapping complexity through systematic parameter transformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250104169A1System, apparatus and method for travel booking search normalization and controlling a display to generate results
Publication Date: 2025.03.27 AMADEUS SAS
  • US20250104169A1 patent drawing
  • US20250104169A1 patent drawing
  • US20250104169A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present specification provides, amongst other things, a computing resource optimization engine that can normalize heterogenous travel itinerary data from different travel actor engines and generate a normalized itinerary on a display device.