Traveling State Determination via Acceleration Cycle Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing devices face challenges in accurately determining whether a user is riding in a train or a car, and in accurately detecting walking or running states when worn versus held in the hand, due to variations in acceleration sensor outputs.

Innovation Solution

A traveling state determining device using an acceleration sensor that extracts specific acceleration components and compares varying cycles to differentiate between rail and road travel, and between wearing and holding the device, allowing for precise state determination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If an acceleration sensor is used to detect transportation options, then the ability to specify traveling state is improved, but the measurement precision deteriorates due to difficulty in accurately detecting rail vs. road travel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to specify traveling stateVSAvoidaccuracy of transportation option detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The acceleration data is segmented into multiple direction components (vertical direction component and lateral direction component) and further processed into frequency components. By analyzing different segments of the acceleration signal in separate frequency bands, the system can distinguish between rail and road transportation modes that would be indistinguishable in a single raw signal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the acceleration signal from the time domain to the frequency domain by extracting frequency components. This dimensional transformation enables the system to identify transportation modes based on their characteristic frequency signatures, providing a new dimension of analysis that resolves the detection accuracy problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If the device is worn or retained on the body of a user, then the measurement precision of moving state is improved, but the device complexity increases due to need for cycle comparison

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of moving state detectionVSAvoidcomplexity of state determination process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines the wearing state by comparing the varying cycles of acceleration components without requiring manual input or user action. The acceleration sensor data itself provides the information needed to distinguish between worn and held states through automated cycle comparison, making the system self-diagnostic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of analysis from raw acceleration values to varying cycle characteristics. By transforming the data into cycle-based parameters and comparing them against predetermined thresholds, the system achieves reliable state detection while keeping the processing logic manageable through threshold-based decision making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the device is held in a hand of a user, then the ease of operation is improved, but the measurement precision of moving state deteriorates due to difficulty in detecting walking or running state

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvenience of device usageVSAvoidaccuracy of walking/running state detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts its detection methodology based on the detected state. By continuously monitoring the varying cycles of acceleration components and comparing them to predetermined thresholds, the system can identify whether the device is being held or worn, and adjust its interpretation of the acceleration data accordingly to maintain accurate state detection despite the different usage conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device effectively discriminates between traveling states, including rail vs. road transport and walking/running states, even when worn or held, enhancing route specification and transportation option recording accuracy.

Implementation Method 1

an acceleration sensor which detects an acceleration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

an acceleration sensor which detects an acceleration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAccelerometer: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS8862427B2Traveling state determining device, method for determining traveling state and recording medium
Publication Date: 2014.10.14 CASIO COMPUTER CO LTD
  • US8862427B2 patent drawing
  • US8862427B2 patent drawing
  • US8862427B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a traveling state determining device including an acceleration sensor which detects an acceleration, a cycle comparing unit which compares a varying cycle of an acceleration of a vertical direction component in an output of the acceleration sensor to a varying cycle of an acceleration of a horizontal direction component and a state determining unit which determines between a state where a user is walking or running by wearing or retaining the traveling state determining device on a body of the user and a state where the user is walking or running by holding the traveling state determining device in a hand of the user based on the comparing result of the cycle comparing unit.