Stackable Tray with Offset Columns for Handle Clearance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing low-depth trays for storing and transporting beverage containers are unstable due to reduced footprint when stacked on dividers and often interfere with bottle handles, leading to fragility and poor handling in cross-stack configurations.

Innovation Solution

A tray design featuring center and corner columns with offset exterior surfaces and split center side columns to accommodate handles, ensuring stable nesting and handling in column and cross-stack configurations, with outer ledges defining the nesting height and inward offsets for handle clearance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If the side walls and dividers are lowered to reduce weight, then the tray becomes lighter, but the stacking stability deteriorates because the footprint is much smaller when stacking on dividers only

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetray weightVSAvoidstacking stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The tray structure is segmented into multiple support elements: four corner columns, four side columns, and interior columns with dividers. This segmentation distributes the stacking load across multiple contact points, improving stability while maintaining the low-depth design and reduced weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the tray have different column heights and configurations optimized for their specific functions. Corner columns and side columns have outer ledges at nesting height for stability, while interior columns are integrated with dividers for bottle support. This local differentiation allows weight reduction in non-critical areas while maintaining stability where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If the columns are tapered aggressively on the outside face to accommodate the handle, then the handle clearance is improved, but the corner columns become more fragile

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandle accommodationVSAvoidcolumn strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The tapering is applied locally only to the outside face of columns that contact the handle in cross-stack configurations, while maintaining full strength at the corner columns and interior support areas. This selective tapering provides handle clearance where needed without compromising overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The columns exhibit asymmetric geometry with different dimensions on different faces. The outside face contacting the handle is tapered, while the interior and corner faces maintain sufficient thickness for strength. This asymmetric design allows handle accommodation while preserving column strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Illumination intensity

If the side walls between columns and dividers are lowered for visibility, then the visibility is improved, but the stacking compatibility deteriorates because the side walls interfere with the handle area in cross-stack arrangements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovevisibilityVSAvoidstacking compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The side wall structure is segmented into multiple columns (corner columns, side columns, interior columns) with strategic placement of outer ledges. This segmentation allows the side walls to be lowered for visibility while the discrete columns provide the necessary support surfaces for stable stacking and handle clearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The solution moves from a continuous side wall to a discrete column structure, adding vertical dimensionality with outer ledges at nesting height. This dimensional change allows the side walls to be lower for visibility while the ledges provide stacking surfaces, resolving the conflict between visibility and stacking compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS8146746B2Stackable low depth tray
Publication Date: 2012.04.03 REHRIG PACIFIC CO INC
  • US8146746B2 patent drawing
  • US8146746B2 patent drawing
  • US8146746B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tray for storing and transporting bottles according to one embodiment of the present invention includes a base and a plurality of corner columns and side columns extending upwardly from the base, including center side columns. The center side columns and the corner columns having outer ledges defining a nesting height of the tray, such that the side walls of a similar tray nested thereon would contact and rest on the outer ledges of the center side columns and the corner columns. According to another, independent feature of the present invention, the noncenter side columns are offset inwardly relative to adjacent columns. This accommodates the handle of the tray in a ninety-degree cross-stacked configuration. As another optional feature, end columns are offset inwardly relative to adjacent corner columns in order to accommodate the handle of a similar tray nested thereon.