Treatment Outcome Prediction via Segmented Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for predicting treatment effects, such as individual treatment effects (ITE), face challenges including unobserved counterfactual outcomes, treatment selection bias, and limited applicability to multiple treatment levels and large-scale observational studies, with traditional methods failing to consider covariate shift and exhibiting high variance or poor complexity.

Innovation Solution

A method that builds factual and propensity score models, followed by a counterfactual outcome model, using weighted averages to predict treatment outcomes and ITE, correcting covariate shift and improving accuracy, and extending to multiple treatment levels and large-scale studies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional methods are used to predict treatment effects, then the prediction process is simple, but the accuracy is poor due to unobserved counterfactual outcomes and treatment selection bias

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the prediction task into multiple distinct models: a factual outcome model for observed outcomes, a propensity score model for treatment assignment probabilities, and a counterfactual outcome model for unobserved outcomes. This segmentation allows each model to specialize in specific aspects of the prediction problem, improving overall accuracy while managing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a propensity score model as an intermediary component that bridges the observed factual outcomes and the unobserved counterfactual outcomes. This intermediary model estimates treatment assignment probabilities based on covariates, enabling the system to correct for treatment selection bias and accurately predict counterfactual outcomes that would otherwise be unobservable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional methods are used, then the model structure is simple, but the system cannot handle multiple treatment levels and large-scale observational studies effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplicability to multiple treatment levelsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs a universal prediction framework that can handle multiple treatment levels through the counterfactual outcome model, which estimates potential outcomes for any treatment level based on observed data and propensity scores. This multi-functional system can accommodate various treatment assignments (e.g., multiple drug dosages, different educational programs) without requiring separate models for each treatment level, thereby improving adaptability while managing system complexity through a unified architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If traditional methods are used, then the computational requirements are low, but the variance is high and complexity management is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction stabilityVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by first estimating propensity scores and fitting the factual outcome model using observed data before predicting counterfactual outcomes. This preliminary processing organizes and pre-computes essential components (propensity scores, outcome regressions) that are then reused in the counterfactual prediction stage, reducing computational redundancy and improving prediction stability while efficiently managing computational resources through a two-stage process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20220222554A1Operation result predicting method, electronic device, and computer program product
Publication Date: 2022.07.14 NEC CORP
  • US20220222554A1 patent drawing
  • US20220222554A1 patent drawing
  • US20220222554A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of present disclosure provide a method, an electronic device and computer product program for predicting an operation outcome. A method of predicting an operation outcome includes determining first prediction model based on a first set of observed data. The method further includes determining a first probability model based on first set of observed objects subjected to first operation and a second set of observed objects subjected to a second operation different from first operation. The method further includes determining a second prediction model based on first set of observed data and first probability model. The method further includes determining first combination of at least the first, second prediction models, and first probability model for predicting a first final outcome of performing first operation on target object. Embodiments of present disclosure improve accuracy of individual treatment effect estimation and can be expanded to application scenarios with multiple treatment levels.