Patient-Specific Treatment Program Determination via Disease Trajectory Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining medication programs are general and not specific to individual patients, often requiring years of experimentation, and rely on subjective assessment, which can be detrimental and fail to account for long-term effects and complex disease dynamics.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves obtaining subject data, using a model to determine system values representing the condition, and determining treatment programs based on trajectories of the condition's progression, including the use of Liapunov functions to stabilize and control the condition's behavior.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If general medication regimes are used for different patients, then the determination process is simplified and can be established quickly, but the treatment effectiveness deteriorates because different patients respond differently to the same medication

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of determining medication programVSAvoidtreatment effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of patient-specific data (genetic information, medical history, current condition) before determining the medication program. This preliminary action enables customization without requiring years of empirical experimentation on each patient, resolving the contradiction between quick determination and effective treatment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key parameters such as medication dosage, administration frequency, and duration based on individual patient characteristics. By dynamically adjusting these parameters according to patient-specific data, the system achieves both rapid program determination and high treatment effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If empirical medication doses are monitored to provide tailored regimes, then treatment effectiveness improves for individual patients, but the monitoring process can have a detrimental effect on the patient's health

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetailored treatment effectivenessVSAvoidhealth deterioration from monitoring
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of monitoring after administering empirical doses, the system performs preliminary analysis of patient data before determining the medication program. This eliminates the need for harmful trial-and-error monitoring while still achieving tailored treatment effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces computational modeling and prediction algorithms as intermediaries between patient data and treatment determination. This intermediary layer enables accurate prediction of treatment outcomes without requiring actual empirical testing on the patient, thus avoiding health deterioration from monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If only a limited number of factors are taken into account when determining medication regimes, then the determination process is simplified and faster, but the treatment accuracy deteriorates due to the complexity and non-linearity of disease dynamics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplexity of determination processVSAvoidtreatment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex determination process into distinct modules: data collection, data analysis, model selection, and program generation. Each module handles specific aspects of the complexity, making the overall process manageable while maintaining high treatment accuracy through comprehensive factor consideration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic models that can adapt to the non-linear and complex nature of disease progression. By using dynamic rather than static approaches, the system accurately captures disease dynamics while maintaining computational efficiency through optimized algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8626522B2Condition analysis
Publication Date: 2014.01.07 NEUROTECH RES
  • US8626522B2 patent drawing
  • US8626522B2 patent drawing
  • US8626522B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a method of determining a treatment program for a subject. The method includes obtaining subject data representing the subject's condition. The subject data is used together with a model of the condition, to determine system values representing the condition. These system values are then used to determining one or more trajectories representing the progression of the condition in accordance with the model. From this, it is possible to determine a treatment program in accordance with the determined trajectories.