Tree Preservation Mapping System for Root Zone Conflict Resolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In urban and suburban areas, growing large healthy trees is challenging due to limited space and compacted soils, leading to tree root conflicts with hardscape surfaces, which can be detrimental to both the trees and infrastructure, necessitating an effective method for tree preservation and survivability prediction.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for determining the critical root zone of trees, considering hardscape elements, using a formula based on five preservation factors to predict survivability, and aiding landscape professionals in selecting the right tree for the right location, incorporating GIS or CAD software for accurate root zone mapping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If trees are positioned in openings in the sidewalk to utilize limited open space, then tree growth space is maximized, but root conflict with sidewalk creates hazardous conditions and requires removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveopen space for tree growthVSAvoidroot conflict with hardscape
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the sub-hardscape zone into discrete segments based on tree species-specific root zone requirements. Each tree is allocated a specific portion of the sub-hardscape area, allowing multiple trees to coexist without root conflict while maximizing the use of limited open space between sidewalks and structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extends the traditional two-dimensional critical root zone concept into three dimensions by defining sub-hardscape zones with specific depth parameters. This vertical dimension allows roots to access soil volume beneath impervious surfaces without compromising the structural integrity of hardscape elements above.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If hardscape surfaces are installed to provide human convenience, then human accessibility is improved, but compacted soil beneath stunts tree root growth and reduces tree survivability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehuman convenienceVSAvoidtree survivability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces sub-hardscape zones as intermediary spaces between tree root systems and hardscape surfaces. These zones act as buffer regions where roots can access necessary soil resources without directly compromising hardscape structural integrity, mediating the conflict between human convenience and tree survival.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of soil utilization by allowing roots to access compacted soil resources within defined sub-hardscape zones. By modifying the depth and lateral extent parameters of allowable root penetration, the system enables tree growth in previously unsuitable areas beneath hardscape surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If conventional critical root zone methods are used to determine tree placement, then simplicity is maintained, but accuracy in predicting tree survivability and identifying root conflict zones is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemapping system complexityVSAvoidroot zone calculation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary calculations of species-specific sub-hardscape zones during the landscape design phase, before construction begins. This advance planning identifies potential root conflict zones and optimizes tree placement to maximize survivability, preventing problems rather than addressing them after they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces conventional manual or simplified geometric methods for determining critical root zones with a computational system that uses species-specific parameters and algorithms. This substitution of mechanical calculation methods with computational analysis significantly improves measurement precision while maintaining systematic approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11774429B2Tree preservation mapping system and methods
Publication Date: 2023.10.03 TREE MATRIX INC
  • US11774429B2 patent drawing
  • US11774429B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure is directed to systems and methods for tree preservation planning of a selected tree within an existing landscape including hardscape elements. The critical root loss percentage can be determined based upon the diameter size of each tree being impacted. In addition, the disclosure provides a system for determining survivability of an impacted tree that takes into account a number of factors to ensure a survivability percentage of at least 70%.