Tree Risk Assessment Using Multi-Scale Image Features

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tree risk assessment methods rely heavily on subjective expert judgment and manual surveys, leading to inconsistent accuracy and high uncertainty due to limited systematic data and ambiguous qualitative assessments.

Innovation Solution

A tree assessment method utilizing a pre-constructed tree risk assessment model with data augmentation and multi-scale feature extraction, combined with intelligent report generation to enhance accuracy and efficiency, reducing manual time and improving consistency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If quantitative risk assessment methods are used with formulas and statistical analysis, then risk levels can be calculated, but the accuracy is limited by lack of systematic data and heavy reliance on expert subjectivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment accuracyVSAvoidassessment consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual expert assessment (mechanical human judgment process) with an automated deep learning model that processes tree images through neural networks. The model substitutes human experts' subjective formula-based calculations with objective multi-scale feature extraction and automated risk classification, eliminating inter-expert variability while maintaining high accuracy through learned patterns from training data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the assessment approach by changing from single-scale manual measurements to multi-scale feature extraction. The deep learning model extracts features at multiple spatial scales simultaneously, capturing both fine details (leaf-level defects) and global structures (overall tree form), thereby improving measurement precision beyond what traditional single-scale methods can achieve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If qualitative risk assessment methods are used with rating matrices, then risk levels can be classified, but the inherent subjectivity and ambiguity reduce assessment reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment simplicityVSAvoidassessment consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual qualitative rating process with automated deep learning classification. Instead of experts subjectively assigning ratings and combining them in matrices, the model automatically classifies trees into risk categories based on learned patterns from training data, maintaining operational simplicity while eliminating subjectivity through consistent automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If manual surveys and inspections are conducted by tree experts, then detailed assessments can be performed, but the process is time-consuming and has inconsistent accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment accuracyVSAvoidassessment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces time-consuming manual surveys with automated image-based deep learning assessment. Tree experts previously needed to physically inspect trees and record observations; now, images are automatically processed through the trained model that performs multi-scale feature extraction and risk classification in seconds, dramatically improving productivity while maintaining or enhancing accuracy through consistent application of learned patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the expert assessment process through the deep learning model. The model learns from training data that encapsulates expert knowledge and replicates the assessment function automatically. This digital copy can process multiple images simultaneously without fatigue or variability, enabling high-volume processing while preserving the expertise embedded in the training data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Measurement precision

If data augmentation and multi-scale feature extraction are implemented, then assessment accuracy is improved, but model complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk prediction accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies data augmentation and multi-scale feature extraction during the training phase (preliminary action) to prepare the model for accurate predictions. By pre-processing training data through augmentation techniques and configuring the model to extract multi-scale features beforehand, the system achieves high prediction accuracy while keeping the inference process relatively simple. The complexity is paid for once during training, not during each assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260017943A1Tree assessment method and tree assessment device
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 GREENVITA PTE LTD
  • US20260017943A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A tree assessment method and a tree assessment device are provided, including steps: acquiring a tree image set to be evaluated, wherein the tree image set to be evaluated includes a plurality of tree images to be evaluated; using a tree risk assessment model that is pre-constructed to perform a risk prediction and a multi-scale feature extraction on each of the plurality of tree images to be evaluated to obtain a risk assessment result and a multi-scale feature; generating an initial assessment report based on the risk assessment result and determining a similarity between the multi-scale feature and a target risk category feature that is pre-stored; and generating a tree assessment report based on the similarity and the initial assessment report.