Trench Isolation Capping Layer for Wet Etch Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for forming trench isolation structures in semiconductor devices are inadequate as they can be damaged by wet cleaning processes, leading to varying step heights and increased complexity, and result in gate leakage due to divots in the trench isolation structures.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the formation of a first dielectric layer in recesses, followed by a capping layer with a higher etching resistance to protect the underlying layer from wet etching, and subsequent gate structure formation, which reduces the risk of damage and leakage by controlling the etch rate and maintaining the integrity of the trench isolation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If wet cleaning processes are used to clean the substrate, then cleaning effectiveness is improved, but trench isolation structures are damaged resulting in divots and gate leakage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning effectivenessVSAvoidtrench isolation integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A capping layer is introduced as an intermediary protective element between the wet cleaning process and the trench isolation structure. This capping layer has higher etching resistance than the trench isolation structure, allowing it to absorb the damage from wet cleaning processes while protecting the underlying trench isolation from divot formation and gate leakage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The capping layer is formed over the trench isolation structure before the wet cleaning process occurs. This preliminary protective action ensures that when wet cleaning is performed, the trench isolation structure is already shielded, preventing divot formation and maintaining structural integrity throughout the cleaning process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If standard trench isolation formation is used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but step height variations increase due to wet cleaning damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidstep height uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The isolation structure is segmented into two distinct layers: a trench isolation layer and a capping layer. This segmentation allows each layer to have optimized properties - the trench isolation layer provides electrical isolation while the capping layer provides mechanical protection and step height uniformity, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The isolation structure uses composite material architecture with a first dielectric material for trench isolation and a second dielectric material for the capping layer. The second material has higher etching resistance, creating a composite structure that maintains step height uniformity while protecting against wet cleaning damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If the capping layer has higher etching resistance, then protection against wet etching is improved, but the capping layer removal process becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection effectivenessVSAvoidcapping layer removal ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The capping layer is designed with spatially varying properties - it has higher etching resistance overall for protection, but selective regions or patterns are created that allow controlled removal. This local quality differentiation enables the capping layer to provide protection where needed while being removable in specific areas where it is no longer required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The etching resistance parameter of the capping layer is strategically adjusted - made sufficiently high to protect during wet cleaning, but with controlled variations or gradients that enable selective removal. By changing the etching resistance parameter in a controlled manner, both protection effectiveness and removal ease are optimized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively prevents damage to trench isolation structures during wet cleaning processes, reduces step height variations, and minimizes gate leakage by using a capping layer with lower etching rates, thereby improving the electrical isolation and reducing complexity in semiconductor device manufacturing.

Implementation Method 1

forming a capping layer over the substrate and the dielectric layer, wherein the capping layer has a higher etching resistance than the trench isolation structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEtching resistance:

Data Source

PatentUS9159604B2Semiconductor device and method for forming the same
Publication Date: 2015.10.13 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US9159604B2 patent drawing
  • US9159604B2 patent drawing
  • US9159604B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes forming a recess in a substrate and filling a dielectric layer in the recess. The method further includes forming a capping layer over the substrate and the dielectric layer. A top portion of the capping layer is then removed, while leaving a bottom portion of the capping layer over the dielectric layer. A gate structure is then formed over the remaining capping layer.