Trend Identification via Specificity Score Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual identification of trends in text documents is labor-intensive, error-prone, and incomplete, as it relies on user knowledge and is not efficient for large datasets.

Innovation Solution

A device and method utilizing natural language processing to calculate specificity scores across temporal intervals, identifying trends by analyzing text sections associated with topics and providing actionable insights based on these scores.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual identification of trends is performed, then user knowledge and expertise can be applied to analyze topics, but the process becomes labor-intensive, error-prone, and incomplete

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrend identification accuracyVSAvoidtrend analysis efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of trend identification with an automated computational system. The system uses processors to execute algorithms that calculate specificity scores for topics across temporal intervals, automatically identifying trends without human intervention. This substitution eliminates labor-intensive manual analysis while maintaining or improving accuracy through consistent algorithmic application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service trend analysis by automatically processing text documents, calculating specificity scores, and identifying trends without requiring user knowledge or manual input. The automated system serves itself by taking text documents as input and producing trend identification results, making the process independent of human expertise while improving efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of information

If manual trend identification is used, then detailed analysis can be performed on individual topics, but the process is time-consuming and not efficient for large datasets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of trend analysisVSAvoidtime required for trend analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the trend identification process into distinct computational steps: dividing text documents into temporal intervals, calculating specificity scores for individual topics in each interval, and comparing scores across intervals to identify trends. This segmentation allows the system to process large datasets systematically while maintaining completeness of analysis through structured handling of each topic and time period.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating specificity scores for all topics across all temporal intervals before conducting the actual trend identification. This preliminary computation of baseline scores enables efficient comparison and trend detection, reducing the time required for the main analysis while ensuring no information is lost in the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If automated processing is implemented, then speed and efficiency of trend identification improve, but the system requires complex algorithms to calculate specificity scores accurately

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrend identification speedVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter changes by calculating specificity scores based on the frequency and distribution of topics across temporal intervals. The system transforms raw text data into quantitative specificity score parameters, then uses these parameters to identify trends. This parameter-based approach simplifies the automated processing while maintaining accuracy, as the complex linguistic analysis is reduced to mathematical comparisons of score changes over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10157223B2Identifying trends associated with topics from natural language text
Publication Date: 2018.12.18 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD
  • US10157223B2 patent drawing
  • US10157223B2 patent drawing
  • US10157223B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device may obtain text to be processed to identify a trend associated with a topic included in the text. The text may include a plurality of text sections, associated with the topic, that may be associated with a plurality of temporal intervals. The device may determine a respective context for the topic in each of the plurality of text sections. The device may calculate a first specificity score based on the respective context for the topic for one or more text sections associated with the first temporal interval. The device may calculate a second specificity score based on the respective context for the topic for one or more text sections associated with the second temporal interval. The device may identify a trend associated with the topic based on the first specificity score and the second specificity score, and may provide information that identifies the trend.