Trending Content Algorithm for Digital Asset Discovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Content distribution systems face challenges in effectively promoting digital assets due to the sheer volume of available content, where newer releases are often obscured in long lists, and consumers struggle to discover relevant titles without specific preferences or filtering options.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of algorithms to identify and rank digital assets based on trend scores, recommendation scores, and breakout scores, using statistical analysis of historical download data, user similarity, and early adoption by trendsetters, to provide personalized recommendations and promote trending, recommended, and breakout content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If content is sorted by cumulative number of downloads to promote popular content, then popular content visibility is improved, but newer releases are obscured toward the bottom of long lists

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent visibilityVSAvoidtime to discover new content
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic ranking that adjusts content positions based on multiple factors including recency, trend velocity, and user engagement. Instead of static download-based sorting, the system continuously updates rankings to promote both established popular content and emerging new releases, resolving the contradiction between promoting popularity and surface new content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the ranking parameters from solely cumulative downloads to a multi-dimensional scoring system that includes recency weights, trend acceleration metrics, and engagement quality scores. This allows newer content with high growth velocity to compete with established content, preventing newer releases from being permanently obscured.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If consumers filter lists by narrowing to specific categories or sub-categories, then navigation to relevant titles is improved, but discovery of new titles from broad categories is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation efficiencyVSAvoidcontent discovery flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the content catalog into multiple hierarchical levels and creates personalized navigation paths for each user. Instead of forcing users to choose narrow filters, the system provides segmented views that adapt to user behavior, allowing broad exploration when preferences are undefined and narrow filtering when preferences are established.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The filtering and recommendation system dynamically adjusts between broad and narrow categorization based on user interaction patterns. When users exhibit undefined preferences, the system presents broader category recommendations; when preferences become established, it adapts to provide more targeted filtering, thus maintaining both navigation efficiency and discovery flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Quantity of substance

If the volume of digital content in content distribution systems increases, then content variety is improved, but consumer ability to navigate and discover relevant content deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent varietyVSAvoidnavigation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces intelligent recommendation algorithms as intermediaries between the vast content library and consumers. These algorithms process content metadata, user preferences, and behavioral data to generate personalized rankings and recommendations, effectively mediating the complexity gap between content variety and user navigation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where user interactions with recommended content are analyzed and fed back into the ranking algorithm. This feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from user behavior and progressively improve navigation efficiency, reducing the perceived complexity as the system adapts to individual user patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11023905B2Algorithm for identification of trending content
Publication Date: 2021.06.01 APPLE INC
  • US11023905B2 patent drawing
  • US11023905B2 patent drawing
  • US11023905B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This application relates to techniques for recommending content to a user of a content distribution system. A server device can generate recommendations as part of a user interface for the content distribution system. The server device can be configured to: calculate a trend score for each of a plurality of digital assets managed by a content distribution system, calculate a recommendation score for a subset of digital assets that are not installed on a client device of a target user, calculate a breakout score for a subset of digital assets managed by the content distribution system each having a cumulative number of downloads below a threshold value, rank the digital assets according to the trend scores, the recommendation scores, or the breakout scores, and generate a visual representation of one or more digital assets to recommend to the user based on the ranking.