Tri-Rotor VTOL UAV Yaw Control Without Servo-Motors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional tri-rotor UAVs require additional mechanical components like coaxial rotors or servo-motors to stabilize yaw, increasing complexity, weight, and cost, and are unable to achieve stable hovering with only three inputs.

Innovation Solution

A tri-rotor UAV system with three single propellers positioned on arms extending from a main body, where two propellers rotate in the same direction and one in the opposite direction, using PID controllers and command mixers to control rotational speeds for stability and maneuvering without additional mechanical components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If coaxial rotors or servo-motors are added to stabilize yaw, then yaw stability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyaw stabilityVSAvoidmechanical design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the yaw stabilization function from dedicated mechanical components (coaxial rotors or servo-motors) and extracts it to be achieved through differential thrust control of the three main rotors. By controlling the rotational speeds of the three rotors differently, the system can stabilize yaw without additional mechanical parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The three rotors are designed to perform multiple functions: they provide lift, control roll, control pitch, and collectively control yaw stability. Instead of having dedicated components for each function, the same three rotors handle all stabilization and maneuvering tasks through differential thrust control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If coaxial rotors or servo-motors are added to stabilize yaw, then yaw stability is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyaw stabilityVSAvoidUAV weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the weight of dedicated yaw stabilization components (coaxial rotors or servo-motors) by extracting the yaw control function to be achieved through differential thrust control of the three main rotors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The three rotors are designed to perform multiple functions including lift generation, roll control, pitch control, and yaw stabilization, eliminating the need for additional weight-bearing components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If coaxial rotors or servo-motors are added to stabilize yaw, then yaw stability is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyaw stabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the need for expensive dedicated yaw stabilization components by extracting the yaw control function to be achieved through differential thrust control of the three main rotors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The three rotors are designed to perform multiple functions including lift generation, roll control, pitch control, and yaw stabilization, eliminating the need for additional expensive mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If only three motors are used with fixed tilt angles, then device complexity is reduced, but hovering control becomes impossible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidhovering control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the rotor tilt angles dynamic and adjustable, allowing the three rotors to change their orientation during flight. This dynamic adjustment enables the system to achieve hovering control and other maneuvers while maintaining simplicity with only three motors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration achieves stable flight and maneuverable lateral movement with minimal position-attitude cross control effects, reducing mechanical requirements and costs while eliminating the need for servo-motors, enabling hovering and lateral maneuvering.

Implementation Method 1

An unmanned aerial vehicle ('UAV') is an aircraft that manipulates aerodynamic forces to provide lift

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

the rotors extending in the front portion rotate in a similar direction, while the rotor extending in the rear portion rotates in an opposite direction, such that adverse torque forces and gyroscopic moment forces are reduced or even cancelled

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorque: Torque

Implementation Method 3

adverse torque forces and gyroscopic moment forces are reduced or even cancelled

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGyroscopic moment: Gyroscope

Data Source

PatentUS11560227B2Unmanned aerial vehicle
Publication Date: 2023.01.24 PRINCESS SUMAYA UNIVERSITY FOR TECHNOLOGY
  • US11560227B2 patent drawing
  • US11560227B2 patent drawing
  • US11560227B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vertical take-off and landing (“VTOL”) unmanned aerial vehicle (“UAV”) system and a method of controlling the same, wherein such method controls the stability and maneuverability of the VTOL UAV by manipulating the speeds of the propellers at each rotor. The VTOL UAV includes a body with three extending arms, wherein each of such arms is aligned and fixed at a certain angle from a central axis passing through the body. Each extending arm is equipped with a rotor with propellers. The rotors are sufficient to control the yaw of the UAV, and there is no need for coaxial rotors or an extra servo-motor in order to control the yaw of the UAV, thus reducing the cost and the weight of the UAV.