Clinical Trial Candidate Screening Using Structured Medical Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for selecting clinical trial candidates are inefficient, requiring substantial manual work and are inaccurate in determining eligibility, leading to delays and increased costs due to the inability to accurately predict the number of eligible patients, especially in therapeutic trials that require a large number of subjects.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilizes a structured medical examination data integrated management database to convert eligibility and exclusion criteria into searchable words, allowing for efficient screening of candidates by searching patient information directly, reducing the workload on physicians and coordinators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual screening of patients against eligibility criteria is performed, then accuracy in determining eligibility is improved, but time consumption and workload increase substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeligibility determination accuracyVSAvoidpatient screening time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical review process with an automated computer-based system that retrieves patient data from databases and automatically compares it against eligibility criteria. The system generates automated screening reports that identify eligible patients, eliminating the need for manual document review while maintaining accuracy through systematic data comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an automated screening system as an intermediary between patient data and eligibility determination. This system acts as a mediator that retrieves data from multiple sources, processes it against predefined criteria, and presents results to researchers, thereby reducing direct human effort while preserving decision accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If detailed eligibility and exclusion criteria are established, then trial quality and subject appropriateness are improved, but the complexity of screening increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrial subject appropriatenessVSAvoidscreening process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides complex eligibility criteria into discrete, searchable data elements that can be systematically evaluated. The system segments patient data into comparable fields and evaluates each criterion independently, then integrates results to determine overall eligibility, making the complex screening process manageable and automated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms qualitative eligibility criteria into quantifiable parameters that can be automatically evaluated by the computer system. By converting screening criteria into structured data comparisons, the system maintains the rigor of detailed criteria while enabling automated processing through parameter-based evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the number of patients to be screened is increased to meet trial enrollment targets, then trial completion probability is improved, but resource requirements and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient enrollment rateVSAvoidscreening resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the screening system to automatically perform data retrieval, comparison, and eligibility determination without requiring proportional increases in human screening resources. The automated system processes large volumes of patient data efficiently, allowing enrollment targets to be met without linearly increasing staff or time resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive patient data review is performed, then eligibility determination accuracy is improved, but the workload on physicians and coordinators increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeligibility screening accuracyVSAvoidscreening operation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the burdensome manual review tasks from physicians and coordinators by automating data retrieval and comparison functions. The system extracts relevant patient data from databases, performs automated eligibility assessment, and presents results, leaving clinical professionals to focus only on final verification and patient communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250378922A1Clinical trial assistance method and clinical trial assistance system
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 JAPANESE FOUND FOR CANCER RES
  • US20250378922A1 patent drawing
  • US20250378922A1 patent drawing
  • US20250378922A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Candidates for a clinical trial can be efficiently narrowed down by, after converting eligibility conditions and exclusion conditions of the clinical trial into search words, performing screening using a database in which structured medical examination data is stored. It is possible to provide a method and a system that select candidates for a clinical trial and a therapeutic trial more efficiently with less work.