Generative Cutting Tool with Triangular Coolant Cavity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for producing cutting tools with coolant cavities are complex, costly, and often require support structures, which can lead to unwanted residue and limit the production of complex geometries and materials, especially for coolant cavities with triangular cross sections.

Innovation Solution

A method using generative production techniques, such as additive manufacturing, to produce cutting tools with coolant cavities having essentially triangular cross sections without support structures, allowing for overhanging walls with angles greater than the overhang limit, enabling efficient and cost-effective production of cutting tools with improved machining properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional machining production methods are used to produce coolant cavities, then manufacturing precision can be achieved, but device complexity and production cost increase significantly, especially for triangular cross-section geometries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoolant cavity geometry precisionVSAvoidproduction process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical machining methods with a generative production method (additive manufacturing). This substitution eliminates the need for complex machining operations, tooling, and support structures required for creating triangular coolant cavities, while maintaining manufacturing precision through controlled material deposition or fusion processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the production method parameter from subtractive machining to additive generative production. This fundamental parameter change enables the direct creation of complex triangular geometries without the constraints of traditional machining, reducing device complexity while preserving or improving manufacturing precision through digital control of the generative process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If support structures are used in generative production of coolant cavities, then complex geometries can be produced, but production time increases and residue removal becomes necessary

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometry production capabilityVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the support structure element from the generative production process. By designing the triangular coolant cavity geometry to be self-supporting during production or by using support structures that are easily removable or dissolveable, the patent removes the time-consuming steps of support structure installation and removal, while still enabling complex geometry production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-planning the geometry design to minimize or eliminate support structure requirements. The triangular cross-section design is specifically configured to allow self-support during generative production, or support structures are pre-designed to be easily removable, thereby reducing post-production cleanup time and avoiding residue issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If generative production methods are used to produce cutting tools, then productivity and cost-effectiveness improve, but manufacturing precision for complex geometries may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidcoolant cavity geometry precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional precision machining with controlled generative production processes. Modern additive manufacturing technologies used in the patent achieve manufacturing precision comparable to or exceeding traditional machining through digital control, while simultaneously improving productivity by eliminating complex setup, tooling, and multi-step machining operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the production approach from subtractive to additive, fundamentally altering how precision is achieved. Instead of removing material with tight tolerances, the generative method builds material layer-by-layer or particle-by-particle with precise digital control, maintaining manufacturing precision while dramatically improving productivity and cost-effectiveness for complex coolant cavity geometries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10576545B2Method for producing a cutting tool, and cutting tool
Publication Date: 2020.03.03 KENNAMETAL INC
  • US10576545B2 patent drawing
  • US10576545B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for producing a cutting tool is described. This method includes the production of a tool body of the cutting tool by means of a generative production method. At least one coolant cavity that has, at least in segments, an essentially triangular cross section is in this case provided in the tool body. Moreover, a cutting tool produced by means of this method is presented. Also proposed is a cutting tool having at least one coolant cavity running therein, wherein the coolant cavity has, at least in segments, an essentially triangular cross section and the cutting tool is produced, at least in segments, by means of a generative production method.