Triangular Open Space Mouth Guard for Impact Absorption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mouth guards, both over-the-counter and custom-made, fail to provide adequate dental protection, are uncomfortable, and often hinder breathing and talking, while also being prone to pathogen transmission due to poor fit and material issues.

Innovation Solution

A mouth guard with a bite line separating an outer and inner portion, featuring a plurality of open spaces arranged in triangular patterns for improved impact absorption and comfort, fabricated from a thermoplastic polymer matrix material that can be produced through injection molding or 3-D printing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If over-the-counter mouth guards are used, then cost is reduced, but dental protection is inadequate and fit is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoiddental protection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mouth guard is divided into multiple layers with distinct functions: an outer impact-absorbing layer, an inner comfort layer, and a custom-fitted base layer. This segmentation allows each layer to be optimized for its specific purpose while maintaining overall affordability through simplified manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the mouth guard have different material properties tailored to local requirements. The outer layer uses harder, impact-resistant material in high-impact areas, while the inner layer uses softer, comfort-oriented material. This local differentiation provides adequate protection without requiring expensive custom manufacturing throughout the entire device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If custom-made mouth guards are used, then fit and protection are improved, but production time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedental protectionVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The mouth guard design incorporates pre-molded features and standardized components that can be prepared in advance. The base layer geometry is pre-designed to accommodate various tooth arrangements, allowing for quicker customization and reducing overall production time while maintaining custom fit quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses adjustable parameters such as material thickness, layer composition, and geometric dimensions that can be modified within standardized ranges. This allows for customisation without requiring entirely new mold designs, significantly reducing production time and cost compared to traditional custom-made guards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If dense mouth guard material is used, then impact protection is improved, but breathing and talking are hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact protectionVSAvoidbreathing and talking
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The mouth guard incorporates porous or perforated sections that allow air and fluid passage while maintaining structural integrity. These controlled openings provide impact protection in solid areas while enabling breathing and drinking functions through the porous network, resolving the contradiction between density and functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The mouth guard is segmented into functional zones: dense impact-absorbing regions for protection and open/porous regions for breathing and talking. This spatial segmentation allows the device to simultaneously provide strong impact protection and maintain ease of operation for communication and respiration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of manufacture

If traditional mouth guard design is used, then manufacturing is simple, but comfort and wearability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidcomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The mouth guard employs local quality differentiation with softer materials and smoother surfaces in contact areas for comfort, while maintaining simpler manufacturing processes for the overall structure. This localized optimization of comfort properties does not significantly complicate the manufacturing process, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The mouth guard offers superior impact protection, is comfortable enough to allow easy breathing and talking, and provides a secure, custom fit that reduces the risk of pathogen transmission, while being cost-effective and easy to produce.

Implementation Method 1

fabricated from a thermoplastic polymer matrix material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscoelastic damping: Viscoelasticity

Implementation Method 2

Impact energy absorbing mouth guard

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact energy absorption: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS9550106B1Impact energy absorbing mouth guard
Publication Date: 2017.01.24 AKERVALL TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US9550106B1 patent drawing
  • US9550106B1 patent drawing
  • US9550106B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An energy absorbing mouth guard is provided with several sets of open spaces. The sets are arranged in the guard at preferred locations. At least some of the sets have arrays of open spaces, where the arrays are arranged in a triangular pattern. Each array in the triangular pattern has three open spaces.