Triangular Pyramid Retroreflective Elements Azimuth Performance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional retroreflective sheets, such as triangular pyramidal cube corner retroreflective articles, exhibit limited improvement in entrance angularity, observation angularity, and rotation angularity beyond specific azimuths due to their rotational symmetry and inclined optical axes, leading to suboptimal performance in various applications like traffic signs and vehicle markings.

Innovation Solution

A triangular pyramidal cube corner retroreflective article is designed with a closest-packed arrangement of retroreflective element pairs on a common plane, featuring line-symmetrically disposed elements with different inclination angles and azimuth angles, optimizing optical axis orientation to enhance retroreflective performance across a wide range of azimuths by combining two types of element pairs with congruent shapes and varying heights of reflective side faces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Illumination intensity

If an inclined optical axis is used in triangular pyramidal cube corner retroreflective elements, then entrance angularity is improved in the direction of the inclined optical axis and perpendicular thereto, but retroreflective performance is not improved in other azimuths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretroreflective performanceVSAvoidazimuth coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by using inequilateral triangular pyramidal cube corner elements where the three base lines have different lengths, breaking the rotational symmetry of conventional elements. This asymmetric geometry creates multiple optical axes with different inclination angles and azimuth angles, enabling improved retroreflective performance across a broader range of azimuths rather than being limited to specific directions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by assigning different inclination angles and azimuth angles to different optical axes of the inequilateral elements. Each local region (each face of the pyramid) has optimized optical properties tailored to specific azimuth ranges, with at least two optical axes having different inclination angles to cover multiple azimuth sectors effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If rotational symmetry is maintained in retroreflective elements, then manufacturing is simplified, but entrance angularity, observation angularity, and rotation angularity are limited beyond specific azimuths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelement symmetryVSAvoidretroreflective performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent deliberately breaks rotational symmetry by using inequilateral triangles with three different base line lengths, transforming the conventional symmetric element geometry. This asymmetric design improves entrance angularity, observation angularity, and rotation angularity across multiple azimuths while remaining manufacturable through precision molding or cutting techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Stability of the object's composition

If all base lines of triangular pyramidal cube corner elements are equal in length, then the elements have rotational symmetry, but retroreflective performance is limited in azimuths other than the inclined optical axis direction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelement symmetryVSAvoidazimuth performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by making the three base lines of the triangular pyramid have different lengths, creating inequilateral elements. This breaks the rotational symmetry that limits azimuth performance, allowing the elements to provide improved retroreflective performance across a wider range of azimuths through multiple optical axes with different orientations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design significantly improves entrance angularity, observation angularity, and rotation angularity, allowing for even retroreflective performance in all azimuths and enabling the retroreflective sheet to be cut in any direction, making it suitable for diverse applications such as traffic signs and vehicle license plates.

Implementation Method 1

a first reflective side face (a1) extending from the apex (H) to the common plane (S plane), a second reflective side face (b1) extending from the apex (H) to the common plane (S plane), and a third reflective side face (c1) extending from the apex (H) to the common plane (S plane)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTotal internal reflection: Total Internal Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS8459806B2Triangular pyramid type cube corner retroreflection article, and its manufacturing method
Publication Date: 2013.06.11 NIPPON CARBIDE KOGYO KK
  • US8459806B2 patent drawing
  • US8459806B2 patent drawing
  • US8459806B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a triangular pyramidal cube corner retroreflective article and a producing method thereof. In the triangular pyramidal cube corner retroreflective article, a triangular pyramidal cube corner retroreflective element pair group is disposed in a closest-packed fashion on a common plane defined by three base lines, and the each of retroreflective elements in a pair having one base line (A-B) shared by the retroreflective elements in the pair. The triangular pyramidal cube corner retroreflective article includes a first element pair group, in which two interior angles (α=∠BAC and β=∠ABC) formed by the shared base line of the element pair and two other base lines are different from each other and the element pair is line-symmetrically disposed in relation to the shared base line (A-B); and a second element pair group, in which the element pair is congruent to a line-symmetrical shape to the first element pair in relation to a line segment connecting vertexes of the base planes.