Triangular SI Joint Implants for Rotationally Stable Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sacroiliac joint implants face issues with loosening, leading to high revision rates due to inadequate fixation and rotational motion, necessitating improved fusion and insertion methods.

Innovation Solution

Non-threaded implants with triangular bodies and lattice structures, optimized through finite element analysis, are designed to provide structural integrity and promote bone fusion, featuring amorphous geometries and lattice portions for enhanced fixation and bone growth.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional sacroiliac joint implants are used, then fixation is provided, but rotational motion occurs leading to loosening and high revision rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixation stabilityVSAvoidrotational stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The implant employs a triangular cross-section geometry with three vertices and three faces, creating an asymmetric shape that prevents rotational motion within the sacroiliac joint. This asymmetric design ensures the implant maintains a fixed orientation once inserted, eliminating the rotational instability that causes loosening in traditional cylindrical implants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Stability of the object's composition

If non-threaded implants are used, then rotational motion is limited, but structural integrity may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational stabilityVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The implant combines a solid portion made of high-strength material with a lattice portion made of porous material. This composite structure provides both the structural integrity needed to maintain fixation and the bone ingrowth capability to enhance long-term stability, without relying on threading mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The implant is divided into distinct functional regions: a solid portion for structural support and load-bearing, and a lattice portion for bone ingrowth and biological fixation. This segmentation allows each region to optimize its specific function while working together to provide overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If lattice structures are added, then bone growth is promoted, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone fusionVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lattice structure is applied locally to specific portions of the implant where bone ingrowth is most beneficial, rather than throughout the entire device. This localized application promotes bone fusion at critical interfaces while maintaining simpler solid structures in load-bearing regions, balancing biological integration with structural efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12551354B2Sacroiliac joint fusion implants
Publication Date: 2026.02.17 GLOBUS MEDICAL INC
  • US12551354B2 patent drawing
  • US12551354B2 patent drawing
  • US12551354B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Bone implants, assemblies, and methods thereof. The implants may include non-threaded triangular implants configured to promote fixation and fusion of the sacroiliac joint. The implants may have a triangular body configured to prevent or minimize rotational motion of the implant. The implants may include an inner core or an outer shell, which provides structural support for a lattice structure. The structural geometry may be generated through topology optimization software, such as finite element analysis, based on anatomical loading conditions for the implant.