Triangular Semi-Submersible Platform With Six Columns

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current semi-submersible floating platforms for marine wind turbines face challenges such as high manufacturing and maintenance costs, complex assembly processes, and limited scalability due to large column sizes and complex structural requirements, which complicate installation and maintenance.

Innovation Solution

A semi-submersible floating platform with an essentially triangular design featuring six columns, where the wind turbine rests on a central column, reducing column and joining element dimensions while maintaining stability and buoyancy, and incorporating a standardized configuration for easier assembly and reduced structural complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If traditional semi-submersible platforms use fewer columns (3-4 columns), then the column dimensions and structural complexity increase, but the manufacturing cost and assembly complexity worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural complexityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The platform is divided into multiple standardized column modules (at least 6 columns) that can be manufactured separately and assembled systematically. Each column serves as an independent floating unit connected by standardized joining elements, allowing parallel manufacturing and reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design changes the structural parameters by increasing the number of columns from 3-4 to at least 6, which fundamentally alters the load distribution and structural configuration. This parameter change enables the use of smaller, standardized column dimensions while maintaining platform stability and reducing manufacturing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If column dimensions are increased to maintain stability with fewer columns, then the platform achieves adequate buoyancy, but the lifting equipment requirements and installation complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplatform stabilityVSAvoidlifting equipment requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The buoyancy function is segmented across multiple columns rather than concentrated in fewer large columns. Each column provides partial buoyancy support, and the collective arrangement of at least 6 columns achieves the required platform stability with smaller individual column dimensions, reducing lifting equipment requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design transitions from a fewer-columns configuration to a multi-column arrangement, changing the spatial distribution of buoyancy elements. This dimensional reconfiguration allows the platform to achieve stability through distributed support rather than concentrated mass, reducing the size and lifting complexity of individual components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If non-perpendicular connections between columns are used to achieve platform geometry, then the platform configuration flexibility increases, but the manufacturing standardization and assembly ease deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplatform configuration flexibilityVSAvoidassembly ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The platform uses homogeneous, standardized column modules with uniform dimensions and standardized joining elements. All columns are manufactured to the same specifications and connected using identical joining mechanisms, ensuring manufacturing standardization and assembly ease while maintaining configuration flexibility through the standardized modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

4Device complexity

If the platform uses larger column sizes to reduce the number of columns, then the structural simplicity increases, but the scalability and adaptability to different wind turbine powers decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The platform structure is segmented into standardized modular columns that can be configured in different arrangements. The modular design with at least 6 standardized columns allows the platform to be scaled and adapted to different wind turbine powers by adjusting the configuration and number of modules, providing both structural simplicity and scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces manufacturing and maintenance costs, simplifies assembly, and enhances scalability by distributing loads across more columns, improving structural efficiency and reducing the need for complex lifting and ballasting systems, while facilitating easier access for inspection and maintenance.

Implementation Method 1

three vertex columns (CV) are arranged at the vertices of the triangle and three side columns (CL) are arranged at the centers of the sides of the triangle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Data Source

PatentUS20240309852A1Semi-submersible floating platform for offshore wind turbine
Publication Date: 2024.09.19 HIVE WIND ENERGY SL
  • US20240309852A1 patent drawing
  • US20240309852A1 patent drawing
  • US20240309852A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A semi-submersible floating platform including six columns (CV, CL) arranged forming a triangle such that three vertex columns (CV) are arranged at the vertices of the triangle. Three side columns (CL) are arranged at the centers of the sides of the triangle. Each column (CV, CL) is connected by a joining element (B) respective to each of the adjacent columns (CV, CL). Further, a side column (CL) is configured to support the wind turbine (A). The columns (CV, CL) that do not support the wind turbine (A) have a weight configured to maintain the center of mass of the set formed by the platform (1) and wind turbine (A) in the vertical of the hull center of the platform (1).