Triazolopyridine PDE4 Inhibitors Isoform Selectivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current PDE4 inhibitors for inflammatory diseases lack specificity for PDE4 isoforms, leading to adverse effects such as nausea and emesis, and existing compounds like theophylline have severe side effects, limiting their clinical utility.

Innovation Solution

Development of novel compounds without a carbonyl linker between ring systems that exhibit PDE4 inhibitory activity, offering a potential therapeutic option for inflammatory and allergic diseases without the adverse effects associated with existing PDE4 inhibitors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional PDE4 inhibitors (e.g., theophylline, rolipram) are used to treat inflammatory diseases, then PDE4 inhibitory activity is achieved, but adverse effects such as nausea, emesis, arrhythmia, and convulsions occur

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePDE4 inhibitory activityVSAvoidadverse effects (nausea, emesis, arrhythmia, convulsions)
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by designing compounds with specific substituent patterns at defined positions on the triazolopyridine core structure. Different substituents (R1-R6) are placed at specific locations to achieve selective interaction with PDE4 isoforms, particularly PDE4D, while minimizing off-target effects that cause adverse reactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by systematically varying chemical parameters such as substituent types, chain lengths, and ring structures in the triazolopyridine compounds. This allows optimization of the balance between PDE4 inhibitory potency and selectivity, reducing adverse effects while maintaining therapeutic efficacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If non-selective PDE4 inhibitors are used, then broad PDE4 inhibition is achieved, but specificity for particular PDE4 isoforms is lost leading to increased side effects

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePDE4 inhibition efficacyVSAvoidisoform specificity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves isoform specificity through local quality by introducing specific substituent patterns at defined positions on the triazolopyridine core. These localized chemical features enable selective binding to particular PDE4 isoforms (especially PDE4D) while maintaining inhibitory efficacy, thus resolving the contradiction between broad inhibition and precise isoform targeting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies asymmetry by designing compounds with asymmetric substituent arrangements on the triazolopyridine core. This asymmetric structure allows differential interaction with specific PDE4 isoforms, enhancing selectivity while maintaining overall inhibitory activity against the PDE4 enzyme family.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentEP2379548B1Triazolopyridines as phosphodiesterase inhibitors for treatment of dermal diseases
Publication Date: 2016.03.09 LEO PHARMA AS
  • EP2379548B1 patent drawing
  • EP2379548B1 patent drawing
  • EP2379548B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a compound according to formula I, wherein R1, R2 and A are as defined herein, which exhibit PDE4 inhibitory activity and may be used in the treatment of inflammatory diseases or autoimmune diseases, in particular inflammatory or proliferative dermal diseases.