Trifluoroethylene Production via Controlled Catalyst Activation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The production of trifluoroethylene through hydrogenolysis of chlorotrifluoroethylene is hindered by catalyst degradation and safety concerns due to its flammability, self-polymerization propensity, and explosive nature, requiring improved processes for efficient and safe synthesis.

Innovation Solution

A process involving a catalytic bed with a controlled temperature gradient during catalyst activation and hydrogenolysis, using a reducing agent and inert gases to prevent premature catalyst degradation, and incorporating steps for catalyst regeneration and heat treatment to enhance productivity and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the temperature of the catalytic bed is increased rapidly during catalyst activation, then the activation process is faster, but the catalyst undergoes premature degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivation speedVSAvoidcatalyst stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The temperature is increased in periodic increments rather than continuously. The activation process uses multiple heating stages with intermediate holding periods, allowing the catalyst to activate gradually without thermal shock that would cause degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

Before full temperature activation, the catalyst undergoes preliminary treatment at lower temperatures. This preparatory heating stage allows gradual removal of volatile components and gentle activation of the catalyst surface, preventing premature degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of time

If the temperature gradient is increased during catalyst activation, then the activation time is reduced, but the trifluoroethylene productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivation timeVSAvoidtrifluoroethylene productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The activation process employs periodic temperature increments with holding periods at each stage. This allows sufficient time for proper catalyst activation at each temperature level, ensuring high productivity without excessive total activation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The temperature gradient is dynamically adjusted during activation. The heating rate is optimized at each stage based on the catalyst's activation state, balancing activation speed with final productivity requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If the catalyst is activated at high temperature immediately, then the activation is more efficient, but the catalyst degrades prematurely

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivation efficiencyVSAvoidcatalyst lifetime
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The catalyst undergoes preliminary low-temperature treatment before high-temperature activation. This preliminary stage removes volatile components and prepares the catalyst surface, enabling subsequent high-temperature activation to be both efficient and catalyst-friendly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The activation process is segmented into multiple temperature stages rather than a single high-temperature step. Each stage serves a specific purpose: volatile removal, surface preparation, and gradual activation, collectively achieving efficient activation while preserving catalyst lifetime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process improves the yield and productivity of trifluoroethylene production while ensuring safer operating conditions by preventing catalyst degradation and optimizing reaction temperatures, leading to a more efficient and stable synthesis method.

Implementation Method 1

a step of activating said catalyst, comprising bringing it into contact with a gaseous stream comprising a reducing agent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Implementation Method 2

the temperature of the catalytic bed is increased from a temperature T1 to a temperature T2 that is greater than T1, with a temperature gradient of less than 0.5° C./min

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

reacting chlorotrifluoroethylene with hydrogen in the presence of the catalyst activated in step i) and in the gas phase in order to produce a stream comprising trifluoroethylene

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS20230391694A1Process for the production of trifluoroethylene
Publication Date: 2023.12.07 ARKEMA FRANCE SA
  • US20230391694A1 patent drawing
  • US20230391694A1 patent drawing
  • US20230391694A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for the production of trifluoroethylene in a reactor provided with a catalytic bed including a catalyst, the process including: i) a step of activating the catalyst, including bringing it into contact with a gaseous stream including a reducing agent, an inert gas or a mixture thereof; and ii) a step of reacting chlorotrifluoroethylene with hydrogen in the presence of the catalyst activated in step i) and in the gas phase in order to produce a stream including trifluoroethylene; wherein during said step i), the temperature of the catalytic bed is increased from a temperature T1 to a temperature T2 that is greater than T1, with a temperature gradient of less than 0.5° C./min.